Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can Domestic Selection cause Macroevolution?
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 59 of 157 (301226)
04-05-2006 3:52 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Faith
04-05-2006 12:59 PM


Re: It's all word shuffling.
Faith writes:
"Ploy" is the right word for a definitional game that changes meanings, makes it hard to think, but changes nothing substantive. This is all that has been done with the terms in question.
I would prefer not to see another thread degenerate into charges of dishonest behavior. Please stay focused on the topic.
This message has been edited by Admin, 04-05-2006 03:53 PM

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Faith, posted 04-05-2006 12:59 PM Faith has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 60 of 157 (301230)
04-05-2006 3:57 PM


Topic Drift Alert
This thread is not about evolutionists playing a shell game with definitions. Please keep discussion focused on the topic.
Another issue: A thread is allowed only about 300 messages. If possible, please try to avoid posting many tiny messages.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 85 of 157 (301580)
04-06-2006 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by crashfrog
04-06-2006 1:10 PM


Forum Guidelines Warning
crashfrog writes:
I don't know how I could be any clearer than that in two posts. Is English not your first language, or what?
Last time I checked the Forum Guidelines were still written in English. I'll withhold any comment about whether you're right or wrong, but I hope you'll agree that the terminology of the topic you're discussing contains the potential for significant confusion. But even if for the sake of argument I agree that you're right and that Kuresu was wrong, that still doesn't entitle you to a "one free jab" card.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by crashfrog, posted 04-06-2006 1:10 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 86 of 157 (301582)
04-06-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Faith
04-06-2006 1:15 PM


Topic Drift Alert
Wounded King and Faith,
My suggestion is to take the discussion about whether evolutionists are playing a definition shell game to another thread.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Faith, posted 04-06-2006 1:15 PM Faith has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 108 of 157 (301881)
04-07-2006 8:30 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by kuresu
04-06-2006 11:03 PM


Reaching an Understanding
Crash and Kuresu,
I want you two to have the opportunity to work through to a clear understanding, but it would be nice if you could be economical while doing it and not use up too many of the thread's 300 messages. I'll avoid putting myself in the middle by not offering any interpretations of my own, but I think if you actually put the text from Crash's Message 64 (where I think this started) in front of you that it might help:
Crash writes:
kuresu writes:
There's nothing symbiotic about this relationship. Unless you want to call mankind a bunch of parasites.
Symbiosis is not the same as parasitism. Symbiosis is defined as a relationship between two dissimilar species that is both intimate and potentially obligatory.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by kuresu, posted 04-06-2006 11:03 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024