Out of curiosity, how within a creationist model do you account for the huge discreprancy in numbers of vertebrate and invertebrate fossils ?
In the evolutionary model it's straightforward, the invertebrates have been around much longer and so have had greater opportunity to be represented in the fossil record.
I did wonder whether the answer might come back as 'well there are more of them.' but I'm not entirely convinced that would satisfy such a vast discreprancy in the numbers of finds.