Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Walking Catfish
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 2 of 19 (70966)
12-04-2003 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by lpetrich
12-04-2003 2:18 AM


Walking catfish are very cool. However, isn't the current hypothesis that legs, etc, developed in shallow-water bottom dwellers before they decided on froggy goes awalking? If that was the case, I like the Ambystomatidae family of salamanders as a better modern example, especially this little guy (Ambystoma mexicanum):
Innit cute? Note the fully developed limbs and hands, coupled with the feather gills of an obligate water dweller. This species (and a few others of the family) remains neotenic, although the majority of the 30-odd species in the family metamorphose into land dwelling amphibians. Here's a pic of one of the metamorphosed A. mexicanum - very rare, and indistinguishable from A. tigrinum:
fixed pic width, hhmm doesn't seem to do anything to page width tho - The Queen
[This message has been edited by AdminAsgara, 12-05-2003]
[This message has been edited by AdminAsgara, 12-05-2003]
{Bumped the width of 2nd photo from 60% to 80%, page width was fine at 60%, and (in preview anyhow) also at 80% - AM}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-05-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by lpetrich, posted 12-04-2003 2:18 AM lpetrich has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-04-2003 10:56 AM Quetzal has not replied
 Message 4 by roxrkool, posted 12-04-2003 11:11 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 12 of 19 (70986)
12-04-2003 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by mark24
12-04-2003 11:28 AM


There are, actually, quite a few of the salamanders which are fully aquatic in both larval and adult forms. I like the hellbenders (ex, Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) of the Cryptobranchidae subfamily (Urodela):
Although you can't really see it in this adult pic, the little guy has fully functioning gills. Does this work?
PS: Notice the resemblance to your avatar?
[This message has been edited by Quetzal, 12-04-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by mark24, posted 12-04-2003 11:28 AM mark24 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by mark24, posted 12-04-2003 12:14 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 14 of 19 (70990)
12-04-2003 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by mark24
12-04-2003 12:02 PM


You have a good point. Salamanders are probably not "transitional" in the sense of demonstrating the sequence from water to land. They're pretty derived, and separated out from the Anurans sometime during the Mesozoic (IIRC). I'll see if I can remember any other extant critters that are closer to the mark, but anything around today would be pretty much at a long-evolved (i.e., derived) state. IOW, your objection concerning the terrestrial/aquatic line - at least in amphibians - would probably still apply.
OTOH, I think that fishies coming up on land like lp's catfish or Chiroptera's mudskippers blur the terrestrial/aquatic distinction more than a bit. There's also some of the Blenniidae that can live out of water for awhile and even one that lives in intertidal pools and deliberately jumps out of the water to escape predators - and can sit around for up to ten minutes (I can't remember which species). IMO, while they may not represent transitionals in the sense your avatar does, the DO show that things are still coming ashore...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by mark24, posted 12-04-2003 12:02 PM mark24 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by mark24, posted 12-04-2003 12:38 PM Quetzal has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 15 of 19 (70991)
12-04-2003 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by mark24
12-04-2003 12:14 PM


Erm, I thought you wanted a fully aquatic tetrapod? The hellbender sure seems to be in the running. Maybe you could define a little more clearly what you're asking?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by mark24, posted 12-04-2003 12:14 PM mark24 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024