|
Author
|
Topic: Does Ontogeny Recapitulate Phylogeny?
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 7 of 21 (94933)
03-26-2004 10:49 AM
|
Reply to: Message 6 by Quetzal
03-26-2004 10:35 AM
|
|
Q do you have a "homogenous" idea of "adult" for both plant and animal? It appeared that when trying on hoxology for size Gould was able to get away with TWO ideas of modern maturity.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 6 by Quetzal, posted 03-26-2004 10:35 AM | | Quetzal has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 8 by Quetzal, posted 03-26-2004 11:04 AM | | Brad McFall has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 9 of 21 (94944)
03-26-2004 11:09 AM
|
Reply to: Message 8 by Quetzal
03-26-2004 11:04 AM
|
|
That sounds correct. I only wonder what to make of Mayr's ambivalence in ONE LONG ARGUMENT as to H(aeckel) and G(ould)later in WHAT EVOLUTION IS then but again relating Mendel and Darwin is still but a chore rather than a pay stub.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 8 by Quetzal, posted 03-26-2004 11:04 AM | | Quetzal has not replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 12 of 21 (97039)
04-02-2004 11:38 AM
|
Reply to: Message 10 by Loudmouth
03-26-2004 2:31 PM
|
|
Comeon LM do you really think they are "eerie" or is that only meant for deep shaking in the online community?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 10 by Loudmouth, posted 03-26-2004 2:31 PM | | Loudmouth has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 13 by Loudmouth, posted 04-02-2004 12:33 PM | | Brad McFall has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 14 of 21 (97880)
04-05-2004 1:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 13 by Loudmouth
04-02-2004 12:33 PM
|
|
No need to change. I am waitng for the day that heirarchy theory explains those nerves interms of data from different levels of organization for that is how I think through the different number of nerves of salamanders and frogs but as long as levels of selection philosophy is working more on emergent fitness it is unlikely that Behe's notions will break the current understanding or less of it in biophysical genetics. take care.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 13 by Loudmouth, posted 04-02-2004 12:33 PM | | Loudmouth has not replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 17 of 21 (99498)
04-12-2004 6:46 PM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by Denesha
04-06-2004 9:06 AM
|
|
Re: Haeckel touch
If the Haeckel GUT was "genius" then there can be NO opposition to my own use of cell death notions in biology. I however do not agree that I am either crazy or g. Life is full of warts and I have many of them.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 16 by Denesha, posted 04-06-2004 9:06 AM | | Denesha has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 19 by Denesha, posted 04-14-2004 4:00 AM | | Brad McFall has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
|
Message 20 of 21 (100049)
04-14-2004 7:17 PM
|
Reply to: Message 19 by Denesha
04-14-2004 4:00 AM
|
|
Re: Haeckel touch
I had seen Holmes' discussing this a way back but honestly I have never been able to preicate that part of his/her discussion. Is there some reason to relate it to Haeckel? I have nothing against German Science in and of itself.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 19 by Denesha, posted 04-14-2004 4:00 AM | | Denesha has not replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
|
Message 21 of 21 (100050)
04-14-2004 7:17 PM
|
Reply to: Message 19 by Denesha
04-14-2004 4:00 AM
|
|
Re: Haeckel touch
I had seen Holmes' discussing this a way back but honestly I have never been able to predicate that part of his/her discussion. Is there some reason to relate it to Haeckel? I have nothing against German Science in and of itself. [This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 04-14-2004]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 19 by Denesha, posted 04-14-2004 4:00 AM | | Denesha has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2