Once again, personification is talking about a non-person as if it was a person. You can't personify a person any more than you can liquify a liquid.
You are assuming that the devil is not a person and then saying that anything that says that he is a person is just personification. Your reasoning is most circular.
... and Jesus has the same sin-ness in him that we do, then Jesus is "de-godified".
Of course. That's the whole point of the incarnation. If He was still God, it would just be a fly-by.
But if he was
completely human then he was not God, however, he claimed to be God and did not claim to be fully human.
I don't see how it makes any difference. Jesus' temptation could only be significant if He was human.
I think that Jesus became man, but I wouldn't say that he was
completely human. If he was, then he couldn't have been God.
Well, I guess I could hand-wave it with the argument that an omnipotent god would have the power to do anything, including being both god AND fully human.
It doesn't matter whether the temptation was by a real spooky devil or just His innate humanness.
It doesn't matter if you don't think that he was god...
The fictional locale is just an indication that (in this particular story) the devil is a plot device and not a real entity.
Got it. Because one detail was in inconsistent, the whole story is fake.