|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: PROOF against evolution | |||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
How do you know it is a circle? maybe it's a square with a hole in it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
I do entirely - you are attempting to reach for the god of the gaps coupled with the "the water fits the hole in the ground".
Your analogue is weak. At the moment, you may think that you have posed a problem that nobody has ever asked posed here before. It's not, it's the first one that most creationist try. I could just tell you why it's wrong, but where is the schooling in that? The next move is generally the "something couldn't come from nothing". This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-10-2004 08:04 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
because you used it in your definition I'm confused - what definition? I don't remember offering one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Because your grammar and spelling is poor and you'd clicked on the button that indicated that it was a reply meant for me.
"you" refers to a singular rather than a group unless a qualification is added. In addition the correct spelling is "Evolutionist". This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-10-2004 09:48 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
OK - let's take this to basics - your point with the house example and the circle is that both are that way because they are the product of a conscious and planned design process?
Right or wrong?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
I see what you are getting towards - the universe created itself!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Nothing here has created itself But that would mean that nothing could exist! EVER! But I know the probability of the universe existing is 1, so that can't be right. No the universe must have created itself - it's the only logical solution.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
no that makes no sense - if the universe did not create itself, then where did it come from?
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-11-2004 05:16 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
not at all - how is it not logical that the universe did not provide this information? Was it not likely that the universe created itself
You still fail to provide a more logical explaination.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
nice dodge - it's ok just to say "I don't have an answer for you".
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
the universe when it created everything?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
maybe it created itself - or do you think that everything needs a creator?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
yes - the universe like we have established - thanks for clearing that up.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
so everything needs a creator? It's a simple question, why don't you give a simple answer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
you are not quite there - you are still making too much of a leap - you still haven't explained why the universe could not be this creator.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024