Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How do we know when the Gospels were written?
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 13 of 123 (300019)
04-01-2006 9:24 AM


A good source for looking at the analysis of the time frames can be found at Early Christian Writings: New Testament, Apocrypha, Gnostics, Church Fathers
For example, when it comes to dating mark (the acknowledged earliest
of the synoptic gospels)
A general range of dating for the Gospel of Mark can be suggested with reference to the external evidence. If the tradition of Markan authorship is accepted, Irenaeus implies that the Gospel of Mark was written after the death of Peter, traditionally set in Rome c. 65 CE. If the tradition is not accepted, as Nineham states (op. cit., p. 41), "Those who are cautious about accepting the Papias tradition can hardly put the lower limit much earlier, for they must allow time for the oral tradition to have developed in the way described above." The terminus ad quem is set by the incorporation of Mark into the Gospel of Matthew and into the Gospel of Luke. If the Gospel of Matthew was written in the last two decades of the first century, the most probable range of dating for the Gospel of Mark is from 65 to 80 CE.
This range can be further qualified by an examination of the internal evidence.
Mark's "Little Apocalypse" in chapter 13 is usually regarded as speaking of the events of the First Jewish Revolt, which took place 66-70 CE. The events surrounding the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple left a deep impression on the Jews of the time. Jerusalem and the Temple were the center of religious life for Palestinian Jews, and the war with the Romans had ravaged the countryside and left thousands dead. Thus, it is understandable that some would associate these horrible events with the end times. An exegesis of Mark 13 shows how the author's description corresponds with the calamities of the First Jewish Revolt.

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Rainman2, posted 04-01-2006 3:14 PM ramoss has not replied
 Message 30 by tsig, posted 04-02-2006 9:16 PM ramoss has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 42 of 123 (328677)
07-03-2006 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by DeclinetoState
03-31-2006 9:23 PM


A good source that links to both sides of the 'early/late' arguements, and the reasoning for them is http://wwww.earlychristianwritings.com.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by DeclinetoState, posted 03-31-2006 9:23 PM DeclinetoState has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 57 of 123 (360716)
11-02-2006 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Equinox
11-01-2006 1:25 PM


When it comes to the Gospel of Luke, there is some evidence that Luke used Jospehus as a source for historical information. If true, that would push the early terminus of Luke to be 95.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Equinox, posted 11-01-2006 1:25 PM Equinox has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024