The Bible was NOT man made, it was Godly made

These are not the people to ask these questions to. Jar is already trying to convince you that the presence of fakes makes the real bible illegitimate as well. If that were true, what of counterfeit money? Does it invalidate real money?In another thread, another party argued that since there are counterfeit churches, there can be no true church! I guess some folks think God can be easily fooled...And if he's qualified to teach any class of any sort, he should be intelligent enough to have figured this out. If he is that intelligent, he's hoping you're not. And if he isn't... maybe someone can figure out how to explain it so that he could understand.These people will feed you atheist "biblical criticism". They have different approaches to the Old and New Testament. The OT is assumed to have been written at much later dates, since it must be assumed all prophecies were written after the events transpired.The NT was originally said to have been written from oral "cult legends" which were never put into writing until about 400 years after Jesus died. Then more scrolls were discovered, and they moved it to 300 years and then 200 years. Now their "theories" (purely imaginary stories) about how the "cult legends" formed and mutated over the years don't work any more, but they keep pushing it so they'll have material for college courses.All these "scholars" assume the bible is untrue. They assumed so before they began to formulate their stories. You'll be told that if you understood "the real story" of how the bible came together, you'd see that there's no God. But this "real story" is pure imagination. There's no "Q" source. They started by imagining only two "sources" for the OT. One used Elohim and one used Jehovah, so they called them "E" and "J" source. But no such documents have ever been found. They have been talked about, and manufactured in modern times for textbooks; but like all atheist revisions of history, they are imagination from start to finish. More sources were added later. More sources = more courses.They'll say there's evidence because "the style of writing changes" several times within a book. My style of writing can change from one sentence to the next. That's they're opinion, but nothing more. And they aren't biased - they're 'scientific' (they rule out God a priori, 'as any good scientist must').It's all basically the atheist's answer to where the bible came from. It's where they think it could have come from, since it "obviously isn't true".You've been told to avoid apologetics, and for good reason. Apologists have exposed and debunked all these atheist lies; and it would be a real shame if you knew the truth. After all, they've put a lot of effort into pushing this stuff.Sadly, it can truthfully be claimed that many seminaries and bible colleges still feature courses in this filth. But Satan infiltrated the church from the earliest times, and he's still losing. If anything, I'd say it's getting worse for him. Just look how he's had to resort to quantity vs. quality of lies here recently. All his present crop of liars seem to be fairly inept. You have to want to be fooled really badly to buy any of this junk.I haven't read the rest thread, since I just stopped cold when I saw this post. It should be fun to see the claim that you have "no right" to call some of the bibles or books fakes. As if the spiritual blindness of another has any bearing on what you're 'allowed' to see for yourself. But I know it's coming.That and all the talk you'll get to make you feel uneducated will continue. But it's so much better to know what the bible says than to know what atheism says about the bible. I guess those who don't know what Satanists say about the bible are uneducated as well, but I don't see that any harm is likely to come of it. It's a bit confusing, since some Satanists pose as Christians and some pose as atheists... Edited by AdminPD, : Warning