|
Author
|
Topic: evolution of judaism
|
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: 08-11-2004
|
|
Message 12 of 82 (148053)
10-07-2004 9:24 AM
|
Reply to: Message 9 by JasonChin
10-07-2004 8:17 AM
|
|
Re: brennakimi
Actually, the particular passage you quote doesn't show that. If you loko at it in the original Hebrew, while 'Elohim' is plural, the verb after it is in singular format. This is a technique in Hebrew that
magnifies the importance of the noun. It was done with David and Moeses too, but no one thinks it was refering to more than one David, or more than one Moses.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 9 by JasonChin, posted 10-07-2004 8:17 AM | | JasonChin has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 16 by JasonChin, posted 10-07-2004 10:56 AM | | ramoss has not replied |
|
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: 08-11-2004
|
|
|
Message 13 of 82 (148055)
10-07-2004 9:28 AM
|
Reply to: Message 11 by JasonChin
10-07-2004 8:59 AM
|
|
Re: brennakimi
It is not a reference to the Trinty. The concept of a trinity is not in the old testament. Deutronimy says 'Hear Oh Isreal, the lord our god, the lord is ONE." It does not say 'The lord is many". It does not say
'The lord is 3 in one". It says ONE.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 11 by JasonChin, posted 10-07-2004 8:59 AM | | JasonChin has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 15 by JasonChin, posted 10-07-2004 10:52 AM | | ramoss has replied |
|
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: 08-11-2004
|
|
|
Message 82 of 82 (154815)
11-01-2004 9:49 AM
|
Reply to: Message 15 by JasonChin
10-07-2004 10:52 AM
|
|
Re: brennakimi
except, of course, it is not there to begin with.. it is projected onto the old testament by Christians, so, it is not a prophecy, it is fantasy.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 15 by JasonChin, posted 10-07-2004 10:52 AM | | JasonChin has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2
