Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The "Circle of the Earth"
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 307 (65649)
11-10-2003 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by mike the wiz
11-10-2003 6:18 PM


I'm glad the circle was mentioned. Next you will tell us Isaiah meant a flat earth by saying circle. Ofcourse planets are more circular than flat, so these desperate attempts to discredit the obvious is quite amusing to me. Ofcourse if Isaiah was shown the earth , why wouldn't he call it a circle. This was a long time ago remember, and he probably thought it the most convenient word. For e.g if he seen a helicopter, would he say 'I saw a helicopter'- ofcourse not, he would come out with some 'then a day' explanation, closest to what would describe it. So these digs at the Bible are pretty petty desperado tactics.
What the verse tells me is that the biblical author of Isiah looked at physical phenomena through the lens of what was understood during his age. It has been argued that the idea six day creation was not affected by the lack of scientific knowledge during biblical times but rather an infallible truth sent down by God and written down almost verbatim. If it can be shown that mistakes were made in reference to natural phenomena because of understandable ignorance due to lack of knowledge, then the six day creation can be understood in that light. To me, the six day creation is an allegory for the relationship between the Christian/Jewish God and his people. We should learn moral lessons from it, but not apply it to things which are easily refuted through scienctific inquiry.
[This message has been edited by Loudmouth, 11-10-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by mike the wiz, posted 11-10-2003 6:18 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 11-10-2003 7:08 PM Loudmouth has replied

Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 307 (65662)
11-10-2003 7:38 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by mike the wiz
11-10-2003 7:08 PM


How in any other way can you sit on top of a circle? Otherwise he might aswell have just said he sits on the earth, not ' the circle of the earth(think). It's simple to see that Isaiah's source appears to have been the real God.
The top of a stool is a circle and you sit on that, don't you? Make that stool really big and you can stretch a canopy over it, set up tents, and watch grasshoppers jump on it, could you not?
Hmmm, moon is a disc, sun is a disc, Earth must be a disc. Not that hard to understand why the Earth would be called a circle instead of a sphere. I don't think it proves or disproves the validity of Isiah's God, just the weakness of a literal translation of the biblical text when it is obvious that it is wrong in specific description but perhaps not wrong in overall connotation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 11-10-2003 7:08 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024