Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is needed for creationists to connect evidence to valid conclusions
tesla
Member (Idle past 1623 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007


Message 4 of 147 (445259)
01-01-2008 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Percy
01-01-2008 9:09 AM


this means that no law of science can contradict God, therefore, being science established truths, that science is in harmony of God and God in harmony of science, because one begets the other.
therefore also: neither can any religion or law in religion contradict science which would be a contradiction of God, from whom science was established by.
percy is spot on.
because theories are tentative religion can reject it on that basis alone, but undeniable truths in science cannot be ignored. the theories are more logically understandable given there's more evidence than : "because it was written"

keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Percy, posted 01-01-2008 9:09 AM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024