Misuse of evolution

Syamsu, you claim that "the current theory, mainly the one conceived by Dawkins, is known to be promoting racism by anti-racists. Dawkins continuously has to write sidenotes that his theory is not supposed to be understood as promoting racism."Can you provide an example? If Dawkins has to explicitly remark that his explanation of Darwinian evolution is not promoting racism, who do you believe? Dawkins or "anti-racists"?I notice that in many of your posts you seem to apply your own interpretation of meanings and implications, despite the fact that they are obviously contrary to what the authors originally intend or how they are interpreted by many other people. You seem to be implying values to scientific theories and explanations which are not there.

SyamsuWhat are the examples of Dawkins' writings which are implicitly or explicitly "known to be promoting racism". You need to provide the evidence to support such a repugnant assertion. Your message #77 failed to provide any evidence to support your assertion.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Syamsu:
His theory about selfish genes and kinselection in context of sociobiology. This translates into natural selection has provided us with the inherent morality to care for people based on their biological similarity to us.

​

regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu

---

SyamsuYou fail to provide any reference to any writing of Dawkins which promotes racism. I think that the way you interpret the selfish gene analogy and kin slection is more revealing about your thinking than evidence against Dawkins. You are seeing things which are not there and which no one else sees.