Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Question About Deception
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 6 of 75 (319880)
06-10-2006 5:18 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Buzsaw
06-09-2006 9:56 PM


Re: No Deception Atol.
Your analogy isn't complete. To make it complete we would need the deliberate addition of details which provide evidence of age but have nothing to do with the process. Say, perhaps there was evdence that insects had laid eggs on the plants which hatched (empty egg cases), fetd on the plants (signs of insect attack) and metamorphosed into adults (empty pupae) - even though the process didn't affect insects at all.
Would that be deception ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Buzsaw, posted 06-09-2006 9:56 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 34 of 75 (320517)
06-11-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Hyroglyphx
06-11-2006 1:13 PM


Dendrochronology
is off topic. However your argument is not based on dendrochronology - it's contradicted by dendrochronology. Think about it. Or start a ew topic if you can't work out why.t

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Hyroglyphx, posted 06-11-2006 1:13 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024