Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Are Christians Afraid To Doubt?
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 31 of 300 (392125)
03-29-2007 12:26 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Phat
03-26-2007 5:03 PM


Great topic Phat!
We should not be afraid to be skeptical of our own worldview. What is completely taken for granted, is that that is only because we are admitting that it is fundamentally neccessary to put truth above our own desires which are biased and subjective.
So this whole notion of questioning ourselves, is really an acknowledgement of truth's exalted status over all of heaven and earth.
Implications such as this are completely missed if we do not use our whole mind (intuitive and deductive) to examine ourselves...
Ringo asked a very important question... 'Are you not the final arbitor of who the final arbitor is on your own life'?
I would like to copy and paste a question and reply I gave to a private party on this issue. I'll call him Bruce:
Bruce:
"Rob wrote, "The price of knowing Christ involves willingly selling one's natural life out to God. The only way to give up control, is to be posessed by another," i.e., "... by God Himself by way of the Holy Spirit."
Your statement quoted above is so alien to my way of thinking that I have to struggle even to understand what it means. I understand the concept of spiritual possession, and I do not discount the idea of the holy spirit. It seems to me that each of us naturally resonates with something, though that varies from one person to another - that by our very way of being we are naturally in resonance with some principle or spiritual vibration. I would propose that what one resonates with today can evolve into a higher resonance tomorrow, perhaps eventually reaching the highest resonance or attunement with the holy spirit. But selling one's soul? Being possessed by another? I cannot conceive of a God who would want us to give our souls in total surrender to Him or anyone else. God may not be my equal, but I cannot imagine a supreme being wanting to be my personal slavemaster either. I think he would want me to enjoy the freedom just to be myself, that is, to be most fully who I am, though I may need to overcome a few tendencies that might be less than helpful (or what you might call "sinful," though I dislike that word). Freedom may be overrated at times, but I do not think it is a total illusion. Didn't God make each of us in his image?"
Now this is the most pivotal issue of all... I ask that you give me a excruciatingly fair hearing here. Because if this is actually true, it is the most monumental discovery in our journey home. So bear that in mind...
God did create us in His own image. And that means many things Bruce. It means that He is Father Son and Spirit, and we are body, soul, and spirit. It means more importantly, that we are meant to be Godly in the moral sense. And this is where I would invite you to read C.S. Lewis' book 'Mere Christianity'. I won't get into it here, but it is pivotal in the discussion of the subject.
It also means that you are absolutely essential. You are irreplaceable. Your uniqueness is unmatched and unequalled.
You mentioned the freedom to be you. But I ask you, how do you even know who you are, without knowing what reality is?
Without the purpose you were made for, you cannot be you! Without the origin, meaning, morality, and the destiny that defines you, how can you be free to be you?
I ask you consider this... you are already a slave! You are posessed by yourself. And as a finite being with a finite capacity to understand, we are posessed and restrained by incomplete knowledge.
Richard Dawkins, the vocal Naturalist at Oxford, wrote a book (which I have not read). And in defending against certain moral systems he said, "We are all just dancing to our DNA. There is no such thing as right and wrong, we're all just dancing to our DNA."
I became aware of this quote in another message of Rabi's called 'The Loss of Truth and a Proposal for it's Recovery'. As a truck driver, I have a lot of time to listen to these lectures and think without distraction. (remember that the next time you see a dirty and unshaven truck driver )
Ravi is not one to be reactionary, and his response to Dawkins struck me. He said, "Ok, I'll accept that! We're all just dancing to our DNA... How much more profound then, are the words of our Lord that 'you must be born again'?"
You see Bruce, that is the central theme of Christianity. And that is why I came to that place where I could ask Him to come into my life. Because I was a slave to the system. A slave to my own passions, and a slave to my own sin. I wanted freedom. And I could not know the way myself. I could not figure out infinite truth with my finite mind. And because of that, i did not know what life was...
And here comes this Christ, who claims to be all of that. What did I have to lose? If nothing happened, then I was no worse off.
But If it was true, the only thing stopping me was my own desire for power and control of my life... which I realized was the entire problem with my life. I was posessed by myself. A selfish wretched little hitler (lower case 'h') just like the rest of us...
And rather than condemn me for it, this Christ paid for my sins, and offered the way out.
Believe me when I tell you that I was astonished when He made Himself manifest to me... I cannot describe it. But like John Newton (the former slave owner), who wrote 'Amazing Grace'... I was blind but now I see. that song meant nothing to me before as it likely does you at this time. Such lyrics are not composed out of wishful thinking... They are a result of being liberated from prison.
When you make that transaction with Christ, you are gaining everything in Him, and still aquiring your self. Do read C.S. Lewis 'Mere Christianity' for more on why... it is real intellectual meat on the matter.
I do hope I am not overdoing it Bruce. But as a kid who grew up Catholic... never once hearing the words of Jesus about the new birth (or much else from the Bible for that matter), and as one who had abandoned the faith for lack a use for religion.... at 33 years old, I began to listen again for myself, and I am still perplexed that it is not more obvious to everyone what is really going on...
The Bible makes it so clear... John's Gospel says it as plainly and as deeply in condensed fashion.
A man in Southern Humboldt County Ca told me recently that he was waiting for the aliens to come and save us from ourselves. Some real and manifest life greater than ourselves to learn truth from.
I told him that it happened two thousand years ago, but that we didn't want Him. We were so offended that he claimed to be God that we crucified Him. And those who preach His reality are ridiculed to this day. We're not all charlatans...
We want our own way, truth and life... And that is more informative of our intrinsic evil than the deeds that manifest from the ideational into the physical as a result.
It all goes back to interpretation of the facts because of motive, ends and means...
"I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; and consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics. He is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do.
For myself, as no doubt for most of my friends, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom. The supporters of this system claimed that it embodied the meaning--the Christian meaning, they insisted--of the world. There was one admirably simple method of confuting these people and justifying ourselves in our erotic revolt: we would deny that the world had any meaning whatever."
(Aldous Huxley, Ends and Means, 1937)
Please do think about it seriously for yourself Bruce. God will give you what you wish for either way. The question is, if we ask to have it our way, do we know what we're asking for?

Matthew 10:26 "So do not be afraid of them. There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Phat, posted 03-26-2007 5:03 PM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 12:52 PM Rob has not replied
 Message 35 by Larni, posted 03-29-2007 2:05 PM Rob has replied
 Message 46 by Larni, posted 03-29-2007 3:30 PM Rob has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 37 of 300 (392149)
03-29-2007 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Larni
03-29-2007 2:05 PM


Larni:
Totally agree.
But then you go a blow it by writing the rest of the post!
More irrelevent preaching.
First of all, what gives you the right to judge my words as irrelevant?
What objective standard of reality do you use to measure such things?
If you wish to do so, please explain. It is impolite to throw accusations without providing evidence. It is actually a violation of EVC forum guidelines.
Secondly, my post was for Phat. I don't expect that you would agree, and I have no interest in convincing you otherwise.
But once again, thanks for the prescriptivism and your personal opinion leveled out as authoritative. Thanks for providing level 3 philosophy in level 1 terms.
It was uplifting and courageous...
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Larni, posted 03-29-2007 2:05 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 2:34 PM Rob has replied
 Message 41 by Larni, posted 03-29-2007 2:37 PM Rob has not replied
 Message 42 by AdminPD, posted 03-29-2007 2:43 PM Rob has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 43 of 300 (392158)
03-29-2007 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by ringo
03-29-2007 2:34 PM


unbelieveable!
Ringo:
"Reality" is what is useful and "irrelevance" is what is not.
So why be afraid to throw out that old box of calendars? And instead of using that C. S. Lewis quote-a-day calendar as a crutch, why not think for yourself?
Any suggestions on what I should think about all these facts you call reality?
Are you suggesting I do it 'my way'?
The fact is, some people are heterosexual and some are homosexual.
The fact is, Hitler exterminated approximately six million Jews...
The fact is, some people love thier neighbors and some people eat them.
Do you have a preference on these matters? If so, why? And on what basis?
and are you in such denial that you actually intend to posit that my beliefs have no impact on yours? And vice versa?
Do you ever ask yourself these questions in the process of criticizing your own worldview?
I don't think you do, because you show no signs of thinking for yourself. You cannot explain why you think it, or by what foundation you proceed from.
What you are told by those who seek to justify their own passions makes perfect sense to you. The whole infrastructure today is shifting to free you to forget thinking altogether and simply do as you wish...
You demand freedom and autonomy, but cannot explain why because you have not thought it through, and have no interest in doing so...
Thinking for yourself is what would make you stop and question these insidious allurements. Just wish it away...
Ringo, there is something you don't understand about your own thinking (or lack thereof). If you don't mind me saying, it is incompetant.
You are committed to 'freedom of thought', yet you confine yourself to your current position whatever that may be. You speak as though your mind is made up... There is no persuading you.
You speak of Chrisendom as knowingly false. But in doing so, you imply truth (the very absolute you despise).
That's not freedom Ringo, that is building a defensive position. It is constructing a wall.
No matter the perspective, it is a fence. Only men such as Charles Manson allow themselves to be truely free.
So freedom is not the same thing as autonomy. Do you concur?
Life without a moral compass is simply not life at all, but death and darkness. You see?
You and I both have a moral fabric. I can see that your heart longs for unity and harmony. But the chaos of unrestricted thought is antithetical to reason.
Boundaries are not the prison we have been told they are by muddle-headed philosophers looking to justify their passions.
Boundaries are instead, the parameters which allow being... to be. Without parameters... (without gravity for instance), we would float off into the abyss of physical space and be destroyed by the Cosmos. We need the shelter of our atmosphere and the force of gravity imposed upon us to remain.
Freedom itself becomes our prison, and 'reason' is sacrificed at the alter of fear.
I do what I want Ringo. Isn't that what you are reccomending.
How you can coherently moralize about my utter wrongness is one of the mysteries of Babylon.
By denouncing my choice of lifestyle, you incriminate yourself.
Suicide of thought.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 2:34 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 3:23 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 47 of 300 (392170)
03-29-2007 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by ringo
03-29-2007 3:23 PM


Re: unbelieveable!
Trust is a wonderful thing. But how can you trust somebody else's thoughts if you can't trust your own?
Perhaps you can't. But we know that we cannot know for sure. So it is the only possible chance to know.
The question really is, 'why not take the chance'?
Why not allow God to posess us spiritually, if the benefits turn out to be real?
We certainly cannot tell from where we are sitting now. We have no human way to rattle divine wisdom out through a human lens.
We wouldn't expect Christianity (if it were true) to make sense to a mere mortal.
You ask me to question my worldview. I do...
I only ask the for the same curtiousy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 3:23 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 4:01 PM Rob has replied
 Message 53 by Larni, posted 03-29-2007 5:55 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 50 of 300 (392177)
03-29-2007 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by ringo
03-29-2007 4:01 PM


Re: unbelieveable!
We wouldn't expect Christianity (if it were true) to make sense to a mere mortal.
Of course we would. Ask yourself why.
I did Ringo. And I can only tell you what I thought of it. And the problem with it was the moral demands. The only part that made sense at first was the part about me being a sinner. It asked me to sacrifice a part of myself by finally being honest that I was wrong in my own desires. That I was missing something pivotal and pretending otherwise.
But christianity didn't fit what I wanted most of all...
In our lowly human wisdom, we seek to have both our physical cake, and spiritual fulfillment too. That's the solution we seek again and again by political and economic means. this unending quest to find unity for these diverse needs.
This Christian message was the only one of a myriad of different philosophies that didn't offer that! It called such a search delusional and impure in it's motive. Christ called my bluff! It is utterly unique in that sense. Almost totally alien in the sense we usually think of human in, and therfore comprhendable in some degree by humanity, but transcending biology and in that sense inhuman.
Not unatural or irrational, but super-natural and super-rational. That is what transcendant means. Not totally outside, but the overlapping of one reality with another. the point of overlap is where the light shines. Just follow the light!
Who would even wish for such a thing? As Lewis said, 'it is not something we would have guessed.'
The question is not whether we can have both our natural desires fulfilled and the spiritual and existential desires for peace on earth (that are not compatable with the former). We can't! We have the one at the expense of the other.
One group of these desires must be killed (blasphemed entirely) or this internal conflict will continue to rage.
We can either have self denial, or deny oursleves nothing. They are the only two options for peace.
We have not found a unifiying theory philosophically that will make good and evil cohere?
So what to give up, depends upon whether or not peace is an intrinsically real purpose and reason for existence.
If all of my desires and reactions to my environment are just facts, then how can we condemn a Hitler for being caught up in his inevitable environment and destiny?
He not only did what is right; he did the only thing he could do...
If chaos, death and bloodshed are the actual reality of life, then hope of peace is pissing into the wind.
Christianity first posits that my longing for peace and harmony is sound. That my intuitve side is getting hold of at least part of a real picture of reality; that Justice and Mercy are actual realitites in the big picture. It posit's that they are absolute realities and that reality (God) itself/himself cares.
It posits that we are held responsible for our choices and demands that we give up being mere men (and the animal desires that flesh brings to a life of it's own) and be taken up into the higher life that transcends it both before and after biological life and death.
I believe that! I believe Hitler should have known better. I believe he utterly descimated and blasphemed the spirit of God within himself. And I believe he did so consiously.
We can hold on to what we have in the biological side of the equation, but that is only a relative existence. It once was not, and will not be in the future, for both you and me.
Clinging to our biology alone, is like clinging to a sinking ship. It'll take us all the way to the bottom with it. All we have to do is look at History to see examples of what such life has as limit's to it's potential depravity. And more importantly, we should look at what thoughts go through our own minds from time to time.
I can't tell you what you think, but I know what I think of at times. Some of those thoughts are so revolting that I must ask myself 'why do I even think of them since I wish not to?'
Where do they come from? Should I act out each one of them? Am I repressing my true self by not acting upon every passion and thought of violence as a means to an end?
So in the beginning, the Christian message only resonates with me as a man, in that it correctly establishes my enslavement to self, DNA, and environment. The doctrine of sin.
And it did so because I longed for that whithin, which is not... the hope of justice and mercy and peace.
The hard part was examining my self and the desires that wished to reject such ideas. Why did I reject it?
Because I wanted peace, but I expected everyone else to give up their pet sins and keep my own?
That's what I did... I blamed others for my lack of happiness and peace. I never took the time to see my own role in this mess until confronted by Christ. Iwas too angry with others and their sins to see my own ugliness.
He only left me two options... Crucify Him in my own mind and pretend I never knew or was beggining to understand (blasphemy of the spirit, which i believe is an attitude more so than a moments choice). Or listen to Him more, so that He could lead me gently to the place of openness and honesty.
That's just the tip of the iceberg Ringo...
Do you put your own worldview through such an objective, systamatized, and thorough criticism?
Or do you just take the easy road and live for Ringo?
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 4:01 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 5:52 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 59 of 300 (392197)
03-29-2007 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by ringo
03-29-2007 5:52 PM


Ringo:
Why do you think you have "arrived"? Why are you afraid to walk out the door again?
I am afraid of nothing... And that is why I know I have arrived. There is no legitimate challenge to my beliefs. And that is because far from being blind, I see right through you...
Perhaps I am deluded Ringo. But it remains to be seen in the light of reason.
On the other hand, and in the light of reason, your philosophical system falls to pieces. You cannot even legitimaize your questions let alone sustain your answers.
God offers without favor or respecting the authority of men, to change that for you and me.
Why are you afraid to try giving up total control of your life to the living God? If He is a figment of my imagination, then you are in no danger right?
If naturalism is true, then it's not even a threat to you at all.
What do you have to lose Ringo? Why are you afraid?
Ringo:
Maybe "objective, systematized and thorough" criticism is the problem rather than the solution. Why not think outside the system, outside the box?
Do you prefer a subjective, unsystamatized, and incomplete analysis of the evidence?
Your question is simmilar to that of a woman at the University of Florida State (Gainsville I believe).
Durring the open forum, Dr. Zacharius shared a definition of culture as defined by the sociologist Daniel Bell. It assumes that 'culture is an attempt to find a coherent and logical set of answers to the existential questions that confront all of us in the passage of our lives'. In response to that she said, 'Whoever told you culture needed to be coherent?... Is that not just another one of these 'Western ideas' we try to impose upon the rest of the world?"
Ravi (who is from the East and has travelled extensively internationally and knows the worldviews) let her get it out of her system without interuption and then he asked, 'Can I answer you now?'
She said, 'yes.'
He asked, "Do you want my answer to your question to be coherent? or can I be incoherent in my answer?"
Laughter echoed through the auditorium...
He goes on to say to the students, 'You know... when you're on the wrong side, or the receiving end of incoherence, you don't like it... We taught all of our students at Harvard, that morality is relative. And then when they go to Wall St. and live as relativists and our pension plans are raided, then we then want to put them in jail... Coherence is a powerful weapon of reality, and it is the best thing when you have a worldview inwhich everything coheres and naturally emerges... The Bible says, 'In Him, all things consist'. Which litterrally means, 'in Him, all things come together and into focus."
So as for your other question... 'why I cannot go back out of the door?'...
I can! But where would I go?
Peter answered this very question when Jesus asked if he wished to leave. He was free to do so...
John 6:66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him. 67 "You do not want to leave too, do you?" Jesus asked the Twelve. 68 Simon Peter answered him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life...
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 5:52 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 7:37 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 60 of 300 (392200)
03-29-2007 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Larni
03-29-2007 5:55 PM


Re: unbelieveable!
Larni:
Come on Rob, step up.
I have no interest in your pedestal Larni. You come down, and then we can talk.
Ringo is far more reaasonable even than you. And that is not a compliment.
Well... to Ringo maybe (sorta)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Larni, posted 03-29-2007 5:55 PM Larni has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 63 of 300 (392213)
03-29-2007 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by ringo
03-29-2007 7:37 PM


Ringo:
You won't know until you get there.
So, in other words... there may just be yet... a way to have your cake and eat it too?
We gotta keep looking right? As Kuresu has said on more than one occasion, 'I don't have enough imagination...'
Forget the facts:
1. There is no evidence for it anywhere.
2. There is no philosopher or scientist who has established otherwise.
3. To suggest so in the affirmative is logically contradictory.
3. There is zero reason to believe we ever will... other than
we want it to be true so bad, that we will deny logic itself and leave reason in ashes... to continue the unending journey into the unknown.
Sounds like the finest definition of blind faith I know of. I can't help you Ringo. You'll lose your mind if you continue in this vein.
We're so intent on finding a way to have it all, that we were even willing to crucify the only man who had the audacity to simply lay the answer in our lap without any strings beyond being overtly truthful with yourself and God's voice within.
Just simple honesty! It is the only requirement! How complicated is that?
"Dammit Jim!... I am a doctor, not a miracle worker!"
I can't believe Ringo said:
You won't know until you get there.
But that's what I've been telling you and you don't believe me when I say I am there. Nor will you believe anyone else on the matter. Not the millions before me, not no one, no how!
You'd have to admit you're a sinner like the rest of us rif-raf... You'd have to concede you need God's help like me and the other weaklings. You're not being honest otherwise and God's Spirit is honest. That is why you cannot hear Him.
You'll crucify Him out of your mind, and forevermore be out of your mind.
It's ok... we're all guilty. Our enemy is within. But do not kill Him yet...
I have made it as plain as it can be made.
Jesus did so first, and taught the rest of us His ways. And they are supremely reasonable and simple to comprehend.
John 8:38 I am telling you what I have seen in the Father's presence, and you do what you have heard from your father." 39 "Abraham is our father," they answered. "If you were Abraham's children," said Jesus, "then you would do the things Abraham did. 40 As it is, you are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things. 41 You are doing the things your own father does." "We are not illegitimate children," they protested. "The only Father we have is God himself." 42 Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me. 43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. 45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 7:37 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 9:25 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 67 of 300 (392222)
03-29-2007 9:46 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by ringo
03-29-2007 9:25 PM


Ringo:
I've been where you are and it ain't "there". There's plenty more road.
Where are you going Ringo?
What are you looking for?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 9:25 PM ringo has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 69 of 300 (392228)
03-29-2007 10:03 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by ringo
03-29-2007 9:25 PM


Rob writes:
1. There is no evidence for it anywhere.
2. There is no philosopher or scientist who has established otherwise.
3. To suggest so in the affirmative is logically contradictory.
3. There is zero reason to believe we ever will... other than
we want it to be true so bad, that we will deny logic itself and leave reason in ashes....
Ringo: You lost me. Are you talking about your religion?
Well then, your easy to lose...
No, I was talking about yours, and how out of kilter it is with the facts as we know them to be on the issue that my numerical points were in reference to.
You do remember what the issue was don't you?
Let's recap... we're talking about whether one can have their sin and still keep peace and harmony in the land.
Rob:
So, in other words... there may just be yet... a way to have your cake and eat it too?
We gotta keep looking right? As Kuresu has said on more than one occasion, 'I don't have enough imagination...'
Forget the facts:
1. There is no evidence for it anywhere.
2. There is no philosopher or scientist who has established otherwise.
3. To suggest so in the affirmative is logically contradictory.
3. There is zero reason to believe we ever will... other than
we want it to be true so bad, that we will deny logic itself and leave reason in ashes... to continue the unending journey into the unknown.
Sounds like the finest definition of blind faith I know of. I can't help you Ringo. You'll lose your mind if you continue in this vein.
I have to agree with myself on all of the above, and especially that last point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 9:25 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 10:14 PM Rob has replied
 Message 74 by Phat, posted 03-29-2007 10:25 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 72 of 300 (392231)
03-29-2007 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by anastasia
03-29-2007 9:53 PM


Phat, if you are listening, I don't know that a person can stop themselves from doubting. The only thing they can do is stop themselves from learning.
Was it you who said I never replied to you?
For the record... I din't know what doubt was until I believed.
Then all Hell broke loose!
Doubt is essential for us...
1 Peter 1:6 In this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while you may have had to suffer grief in all kinds of trials. 7 These have come so that your faith--of greater worth than gold, which perishes even though refined by fire--may be proved genuine and may result in praise, glory and honor when Jesus Christ is revealed.
Re 3:18 I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by anastasia, posted 03-29-2007 9:53 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by anastasia, posted 03-29-2007 11:00 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 75 of 300 (392236)
03-29-2007 10:33 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by ringo
03-29-2007 10:14 PM


Rob:Where are you going Ringo?
Forward.
Rob: What are you looking for?
Why do I have to be looking "for" something?
Because... there... is... no... way... to... tell... if... you... are... moving... forward...
...if... you... don't... know... what... you... are... looking... for...
How do you know you're not moving backwards, or moving along upside down or inside out?
You call that courage?
That is the smallest and most desperate and il-motivated lack of caring about anyone but yourself.
It's all a game to you isn't it?
I am just a toy for your amusement no?
A rattle for you to play with?
Anything to entertain yourself eh Ringo????
Simple pleasure is so hard to find after riding the waves of bliss as you have huh?
Let me leave you with a warning...
Regarding this quest for self-fulfillment, sociologist Daniel Yankelovich arrived at an astounding analysis. He’d studied several couples in their pursuits and came to this conclusion. Please notice the word “and” in his summary of one particular couple he called “Abby and Mark.”
Here’s what he said. “If you feel it is imperative to fill all your needs, and if these needs are contradictory or in conflict with those of others, or are simply unfillable, then frustration inevitably follows. To Abby and to Mark self-fulfillment means having a career and marriage and children and sexual freedom and autonomy and being liberal and having money and choosing non-conformity and insisting social justice and enjoying city life and country living and simplicity and graciousness and reading and good friends and on and on.
“The individual is not truly fulfilled by becoming ever more autonomous. Indeed, to move too far in this direction is to risk psychosis, the ultimate form of autonomy. The injunction that to find one’s self, one must lose one’s self, contains the truth any seeker of fulfillment needs to grasp.”
Chesterton’s dictum has proven true... Meaninglessness does not come from being weary of pain, but from being weary of pleasure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 10:14 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 10:39 PM Rob has replied
 Message 101 by sidelined, posted 03-30-2007 8:00 AM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 76 of 300 (392238)
03-29-2007 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Phat
03-29-2007 10:25 PM


Re: This makes No Sense
This entire post is confusing and vague to me, Rob. I don't understand your point at all.
Well a chapter of a book isn't very interesting without the context.
You'll have to read through our conversation from a few posts back if you want to make heads or tails of it.
Ringo does as masterful a job as anyone in confuting the issues.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Phat, posted 03-29-2007 10:25 PM Phat has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 78 of 300 (392241)
03-29-2007 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by ringo
03-29-2007 10:39 PM


I thought you were the one who claimed to have found the Perfect Wave™.
I doubt that you have.
No no... my indulgences have been... rather bland to a man of your tastes.
What's left when it doesn't do it for you any more Ringo?
Where do you go for excitement when you've exhausted all of the avenues of semi-legal erotica?
You go to the grave, that's where...
And yet forgiveness is within your reach. It's free!
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by ringo, posted 03-29-2007 10:39 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Phat, posted 03-29-2007 10:56 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 88 of 300 (392257)
03-30-2007 12:58 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by Phat
03-29-2007 10:56 PM


Re: Jabberwockian Ramblings
Phat:
Jabberwockian Ramblings
So does jar run this show or what?
Edited by Rob, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Phat, posted 03-29-2007 10:56 PM Phat has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024