Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   RESURRECTION : THE EVIDENCE (+ Apostolic Martyrdom considerations)
xandrezz
Inactive Member


Message 223 of 233 (95720)
03-29-2004 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by Cold Foreign Object
03-17-2004 2:53 AM


What does Dr. Scott actually teach about the Resurrection?
After so much discussion about the Resurrection, why not read Dr. Scott's Scott's presentation first/finally? The organization and continuity of his teaching demonstrate the singular advantage of getting it straight from the 'Doctor's' mouth on this subject and can only clarify his position; He does speak for himself!
As for the other facets: the dating, the witnesses, Jesus' claims, the facts assumed for discussion, et al, the Body of Evidence of the Resurrection is The Prerequisite in the First Book of Xandrezz.
As it was asked of me, so I ask any reader now: Ask God, "If you do exist, help me understand." Then you'll be equipped for an informed discussion, in which I would like to join you.
Xandrezz
The Resurrection by Dr. W. euGene Scott, Ph.D.
Long cut-n-paste replaced with link. --Admin
[This message has been edited by Admin, 03-29-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 03-17-2004 2:53 AM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by Asgara, posted 03-29-2004 6:02 PM xandrezz has not replied
 Message 225 by PaulK, posted 03-29-2004 6:33 PM xandrezz has replied

xandrezz
Inactive Member


Message 226 of 233 (98234)
04-06-2004 9:04 PM
Reply to: Message 225 by PaulK
03-29-2004 6:33 PM


Re: What does Dr. Scott actually teach about the Resurrection?
Now, today is Passover. Today I'm making the time to address the very point of this forum and its standstill (WILLOWTREE's been 'unhappy' under his shady agenda; yet, thank you others for showing a welcome to and interest in my maiden contribution, but withhold the snideness, I don't mind honest doubt): Q: What day was Passover in that year, month and day, that a certain Jesus was crucified--if he lived, was the son of [a] god, or that Passover has nothing or everything to do with truth . . . does anybody come out of any grave?
I do admit I haven't reviewed the bulk of the preceding 222 installments, so I'm missing some pre-reqs, too!
I will go on some assumptions of my own, that you all have: 1) a SOURCE other than a Catholic Encyclopedia is the basis for determining this particular day; an astronomically projected reference is a start; 2) a basic familiarity with the all the Hebraic Feast Days (set times); 3) one single verse related to that only Passover in [circa] 33 AD; 4) we'll start with the verse that Jesus was crucified "the day before the Sabbath."
Moreover, any study with the Pyramid (just no pyramidal maniac), Stonehenge, and/or the Deckons of the sky and a real appreciation for the difference between primary and secondary witnesses/sources will really help drive this nail into the tree!
If you go into any practicing Jewish home today, especially before sundown, they are all in some sort of activity prepering their home for the next feast: Unleavened Bread, in a white tornado of sorts, to rid every speck of impurity, uncleanliness and soil. This feast is a high Sabbath: a special Sabbath for this holy day that follows the previous day's holiness; then come the end of the week will be the weekly Sabbath—Shebat Shalom!--Saturday as others know it (the Irish National Holiday and the day before the sabbath to the 'Mon-to-Fri-nine-to-five'ers'). The day before this Saturday is the weekly holy day to Islam and so-called Good Friday: the annual holy day for Non-Protestants and others who are glad to get the afternoon off.
Good Frailia, and its fishy goddess, is the ancient nomenclature (many gave up crying for Tammuz long before the forty days were up, more did not—still!). Frailia, Ishtar, Ashtoreth, Isis, Diana, Aphrodite, Baelti, Miadomina/Madonna are all alias for Samairama, Nimrod’s slut of a wife: ‘his lady.’ This is common knowledge to students of Babylonian Mystery religions, including the Pope.
There’s motive to skew the controlling history of this event, as well as the motive to perpetuate it for financial reasons since day one until the now. A contestant for power in a religious-societal frame knows how to market, sell and spin whatever it takes to rake in the numbers—but what if you’re a real devil? There is a contest going-on for the minds of men, here and now, in this argument, in institutions of tradition, and in the eternal court, where one is telling the truth and one is lying. )
An excerpt:
. . .Now, the reason that I do this every Easter is I try to demonstrate that you don't have to park your brains at the door of the church when you come in.
"Faith cometh by hearing, hearing by the word of God." You don't just make people believe, but if you expose yourself to evidence, something happens inside and there will be a psychological reaction. My quarrel with people who deny the resurrection and live a life style that pays no attention to it, is that I can ask them 15 questions and find they haven't spent 15 hours of their life looking at it. (ADMIT IT!)
If this is true, this is the center of the universe. If this is true, this is the central fact of history. You have to be a fool among all fools of mankind to not think it's worth at least 30 hours of study in your whole life. But there are many intelligent people in the world who have looked and come away convinced. That's why I am doing this.
Dr.Gene Scott
{Hey! Make a reservation, if you can be in the LA area THIS Sunday and hear the evidence straight from the Doctor’s mouth: the recipe’s always different but the ingredients are always the same from 50+ years of focus since the initial 3 spent mining the nuggets (see DGS.COM)}
It’s like the Supreme Court’s upholding the Miranda Right’s as an irremovable decision, because society has grown so attached to them, that it is too hurtful to reverse it now. (They should likewise say the same—once and for all— about Roe v. Wade.)
The major source for any topic in this discussion is the Bible, which says Jesus was crucified the day before the Sabbath. I another place, for one, it says, which Sabbath (cf. Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, the Gospels and Acts; we’ll do so next time per entry, as well as eventually go through, point for point, through ALL of the evidence that led to the conclusion of the Resurrection—OK?)
Carpe diem!
Xandrezz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 225 by PaulK, posted 03-29-2004 6:33 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by PaulK, posted 04-07-2004 3:31 AM xandrezz has replied

xandrezz
Inactive Member


Message 228 of 233 (98427)
04-07-2004 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by PaulK
04-07-2004 3:31 AM


There are many questions I didn't answer after just two postings.
Now that one of the Resurrection message texts has been put on the table, and by reading it, one's own skills of close reading and critical analysis leave each to their own conclusion. You tell me: Did WT accurately represent that teaching?
My quarrel with WT is why wouldn't that person have simply let others see a text and have them experience it for themself, for one? That text was from a one hour presentation; sometimes the Resurrection teaching is a two hour session or over a three week treatment; its original form was in six volumes.
I don't like it, when someone discusses another's work (by withholding it) without a previous, direct exposure to their knowledge, except in reference. Of course, a simple search of Dr. Gene Scott on the web would have led readers to that direct source. My answer to the question of the accuracy of WT is, in a word, YES! My opinion of WT's ethics is, in a word, shady; that person's treatment of Xandrezz for stepping with that info was pure ass-holiness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by PaulK, posted 04-07-2004 3:31 AM PaulK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024