Buzsaw writes:
Huntard, that, have you learned anything here demeaning and blind asserted tune you're singing is all too often the evolutionist response to viable arguments of creationists.
And it always seems to be true as well, imagine that.
It's time you drop the hum drum old personal attack tune and stick to the debate tune of effective responses such as what we are required to sing.
Why? You're not showing any evidence. There's literally
nothing to debunk, you haven't even shown anything. All that's left for me is to point out the rather obvious fact you have misrepresented science and evolution
once again
Huntard, perhaps you should reread carefully what you responded to and get back to me on that. You're response makes no sense relative to my statement and needs some clarification.
Really? Allow me to break down your response:
Though I'm not up to date on responses,
Here, you say you haven't yet read all response in this thread. Ok, that's clear.
as yet, so far as I'm aware
Here you say the same thing twice, that you currently haven't. Well
duh you said that in your initial sentence, no need to repeat it twice.
none of you, my evolutionist friends
You are now going to state something we have failed to do, in your eyes.
have effectively refuted the co-existant/survival problem of yours
This is the thing we failed to do, refute this so called "co-existant/survival problem" of ours.
a problem which mine has a practical solution for.
Here you say that you have a practical solution to the "co-existant/survival problem".
Now, My response to this was pointing out to you that we have
no "co-existant/survival problem", since no one here claims it is a problem for snakes or other reptiles to have co existed with dinosaurs, and yet have survived the extinction event that led to the disappearance of the dinosaurs.
Clear enough for ya?