dinosaur and human co-existence

Ever see these links before? http://www.zillmer.com/rezeengl.htm
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.htm
http://members.truepath.com/objective/creation.htmlDan
http://musicinit.com/pvideos.html

Funnily enough yes on the other two threads you posted that were identical...Percy is there any chance of moving any meaningfull responses into one thread and closing the other 2?

Posting links with no accompanying discussion isn't an effective way to begin discussion. Dan asks, "Ever see these links before?" Does that mean, "Ever see them before, aren't they enlightening?" or "Ever seen them before, aren't they ridiculous." That's why the guidelines request that bare links not be posted, that they be accompanied by explanation or discussion of the point to be taken from them.I'll leave this thread open in case anyone wants to address the issues presented in the links from an educational perspective.--Percy

Sorry Percy. You can delete this whole thread if you want. This discussion is happening elsewhere in this forum.Da

I think the link is precisely to any GPS accuracy happening here. Sorry to see this slot is nodally elsewhere

I have, elsewhere, and quite frivolously suggested that
find a human in the jaws of a dinosaur would put a dent
in evolutionary theory.Logically, and seriously that isn't true ... unless this
was found consistently throughout the fossil record, and involved
many species not thought to co-exist.It is not beyond the realms of possibility that some dinosaur
populations existed long after we think they were extinct (examples
of living fossils have been known). Nor is it beyond the
realms of possibility that large land-reptiles existed during
the time of early man for which there are no, as yet, found
remains. New species of dinosuar are uncovered as we search out
fossils, just as new living creatures are discovered as we
explore the previously inaccessible locales on earth.Dragons are a global feature of mythology ... perhaps there is
substance to the old stories ... and man made them extinct because
they were a theat to his survival.Perhaps, perhaps ....What type of dinosaur made the footprints in question ?How do we know that it wasn't one of the gigantic predatory
bird thingy's that used to roam the americas (or a survived
colony of such) etc. etc. etc.The forests of america are still, largely unexplored aren't they ?The DATA (at face value) suggests that a human and a dinosuar-footed
creature existed around the same time period.Possible explanation:: Humans and a form of dinosaur co-existed.Conclusion:: 1) Some dino-like species did not become extinct until after man existed.Possible explanation:: The tracks were made at different times.not a geologist so cannot go further with that one.Nothing about the tracks impacts evolution/creation debate, only
the dates when different critters existed.

Peter, Nice to see someone recognize the "co"existence issue. I have always been preplexed by this use of the term by Wallance and the general older idea of the offspring returning to the parent form. The thought is so general that this is the means by which New Zealand Panbiogeographers survied Criticism by both musuems (BM and AMNH) on both sides of this pond. Page some how got hired out of NZ land by sticking to this as the subject to enter evolution talk with.

Isn't it true that dinosaurs are painted on cave walls? What about DRAGONS? Where did they come from? Heard about the dinosaur fossils buried in the same strata as human remains? Dinosaurs are accurately described in the Bible. Heard of the un-fossilized dinosaur? Must be younger than "millions of years" !All of these things say that man must have been there at the same time.Dan

In EIGHT(!!!) years you have learnt nothing, and still believe that men walked hand-in-hand with dinosaurs? That's a lot of crap to be holding in your head for that amount of time. I'd see a doctor about that, there could be lasting damage...

I'm pretty sure you meant there apparently has been lasting damage.

---

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas JeffersonFor we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack ObamaWe see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

No, of course not. The same place as Harry Potter. They're aren't any. No they're not. Nope. And if anyone ever finds one I shall be alerted by the sound of a billion evolutionists celebrating. Then it's a shame that all these things are stuff that people have made up, otherwise it might actually be interesting.One question interests me --- why do you want this to be true?Just because something is a mistake based on a fantasy doesn't necessarily mean that it's an argument for creationism. Some things are wrong without being creationist arguments.

Indonesia. As indicated clearly on most early nautical maps. They and dinosaurs are both diapsids, but there's really not that much resemblance. Dinosaurs are birds, dragons are dragons. Welcome to Geography & Environment | Department of Geography & EnvironmentThey are, extremely good at guarding treasure. Also popular for virgin sacrifices.

If dinos were cavorting about in recent times, where are the bones?We have bones from mammoth, mastodon, sloth, and all manner of critters now extinct. They're a dime a dozen.Where are the dinosaur bones (bones, not fossils)?

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

just curious about what type of dinosaurs you are refering to. When i think of modern dinosaurs i think in terms of crocodiles and iguanas and comodo dragonsarnt these all a type of 'dinosaur'.... literally meaning lizards?

No, the word dinosaur, "thunder lizard", turns out to be a misnomer. Lizards are reptiles, dragons, crocodiles and alligators are reptiles, snakes are also reptiles. Dinosaurs are not in fact reptiles. If you wanted to group them into one of our modern classifications, birds are in the direction you want to look. Different body structure, different apparent metabolism. The dodo would be a nice modern dinosaur, if they weren't extinct themselves. Those awesome birds like ostriches and emus in Catholic Scientist's Theropods and Birds showing a change in kinds are the best match for "modern dinosaurs" if you like.What Coyote is really asking here is, if man and ancient real undeniable dinosaurs co-existed, how come we can't find bones of them that are intact and non-fossilized the way we can things like neanderthals and mammoths. I think?Regardless, my point is that we don't need dinosaurs to explain legends about dragons, we have actual dragons roaming the source locations within history and not yet quite extinct, still happily stealing sheep and biting celebrities and so forth.Edited by Iblis, : AbE