Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationist Fred Williams' Web Site Lies
John
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 40 (23366)
11-20-2002 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by wwjd
11-20-2002 9:36 AM


quote:
Originally posted by wwjd:
I've been informed of the scientific view. Your dating method is inacurate.
Carbon dating is perfectly accurate within its margin of error It isn't applicable to all materials, nor to all time frames, and it is subject to contamination. Big suprise. We live in an imperfect world.
Why not post your data proving C14 inaccurate?
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by wwjd, posted 11-20-2002 9:36 AM wwjd has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by wwjd, posted 11-20-2002 7:11 PM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 40 (23445)
11-20-2002 11:25 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by wwjd
11-20-2002 7:11 PM


quote:
Originally posted by wwjd:
Why not try this on for size.
"...Carbon dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results..."
Harvey Rowe (Smithsonian Institute)
Curator, Antiquities
This having been said when the head of a chewed up barbie doll was found buy some guy who likes to dig in his back yard and decided to send his findings to the Smithsonian Institute to have it carbon dated.

Well, you can't carbon date plastic-- such as a barbie doll head.
The head was chewed up, presumably by an animal of some kind. This would introduce organic matter which could be dated (maybe) but wouldn't match the age of the head.
A barbie doll head would have been manufactured within the last hundred years or so. Human activity-- nuclear tests-- has skewed atmospheric C14 levels.
I doubt that the guy digging in his yard followed any of the proper procedures to prevent contamination. (of the plastic head that can't be dated anyway)
I also doubt that the guy digging in his backyard properly prepped the sample.
So, how about the complete quotation and a source for it, so we can check it out.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by wwjd, posted 11-20-2002 7:11 PM wwjd has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Quetzal, posted 11-21-2002 4:32 AM John has replied

John
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 40 (23479)
11-21-2002 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Quetzal
11-21-2002 4:32 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Quetzal:
Actually, I'd be willing to bet that the curator, when confronted with some bozo demanding that a plastic toy be carbon dated, probably said something like: "Why the hell would we waste time and money on a C14 assay on a piece of plastic? Any idiot knows carbon dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results if you try and use it on plastic. Must have been a creationist that sent this in."
No kidding. He saw the chance for some quick cash and a good laugh.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Quetzal, posted 11-21-2002 4:32 AM Quetzal has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024