Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The truth about the mainstream cosmologist establishment
Admin
Director
Posts: 13042
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 2 of 132 (180451)
01-25-2005 1:05 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13042
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 32 of 132 (180759)
01-26-2005 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by compmage
01-26-2005 7:08 AM


To everyone:
The question Hanno2 poses in this thread is that if scientists could be wrong about cosmology, then couldn't they be just as wrong about evolution. To forward this point, Hanno2 introduces the electric/plasma theory of cosmology as an alternative to mainstream cosmological views, asserting that the theory is so compelling that it clearly invalidates most currently accepted cosmological models. The electric/plasma theory of cosmology is the topic of this thread, not evolution.
To Hanno2:
Hanno2 writes:
As I recall this forum has an entire section on the origin of live. If this is not covered in evolution theory, then that topic doesn't even belong here.
EvC Forum is a science site covering all topics relevant to the Creation/Evolution debate. It is not an evolution site. The primary claim of Creationism is that it is as scientifically valid as evolution, and this site is intended to explore this claim.
If you were real scientists, you would've investigate this issue further before dismissing it after reading just one web page (no doubt with a LOT of prejadice as well) But you're not interested in finding out if there is a better model to explain the universe, you're only interested in holding on to your old models.
Rule 3 of the Forum Guidelines:
  1. Respect for others is the rule here. Argue the position, not the person. The Britannica says, "Usually, in a well-conducted debate, speakers are either emotionally uncommitted or can preserve sufficient detachment to maintain a coolly academic approach."
The goal of EvC Forum is to provide a site for constructive debate between Creationists and evolutionists through effective moderation. The Forum Guidelines provide the foundation for most moderation decisions.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by compmage, posted 01-26-2005 7:08 AM compmage has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by CK, posted 01-26-2005 9:38 AM Admin has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13042
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 47 of 132 (180830)
01-26-2005 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by compmage
01-26-2005 12:40 PM


Hi Hanno2,
You replied more than 40 minutes after I added my request to not reply to Crash's off-topic message. When I said"This message is off-topic. Please ignore." I wasn't referring to my request.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by compmage, posted 01-26-2005 12:40 PM compmage has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024