A layman's questions about universes

This Universe could or could not be infinite. This is a question with no current definitive answer.A1. If it currently is not infinite then it cannot become infinite.A2. YesA3. YesA4. a) Impossible to answer
b) Meaningless question
c) It cannot - but really a nonsensical questionA5. a) Meaningless
b) Our "observable" universe couldThis message has been edited by Eta_Carinae, 06-19-2004 09:03 PM

is still an idiot. After all these months I thought you might have clued yourself in a little.Still pushing the science is a conspiracy nonsense?

What I remember is that you completely confused even yourself with your prattlings about the Sun.You categorically failed to understand not only the basic stellar physics but also the observations themselves.

I tried very hard to understand where buzsaw was going with that thread. After posting many posts with the current theory and observations I thought I understood what he was asking.Then he goalpost shifted - though I don't think deliberately. I just think he has problems putting together sentences that express his questions.I was NOT the only one having problems understanding what he was getting at.Once I explained something he then claimed it wasn't answered or he shifted the question somewhat - I think he did anyway because overall it was impossible to really figure out what he was asking.If I remember no one else could figure out what it was he was truly intimating.It was frustrating because I genuinely tried to explain the situation as best I can on a message board such as this.The problem is that Creationists invariably think there is some CONSPIRACY of the scientific community against them. Thus buzsaw interpreted my trouble of understanding his questions as deliberate fogging the issue on my part.This categorically was not and is not the case.Why hide the facts and theory when they support my contentions in this area.I must admit I actually do not remember the exact gist of buzsaw's arguments even now. What is more - I'll wager he doesn't either.

You still have the solar physics and observations wrong.I'll stand by what I said before - a suddenly created (last 6000 years) Sun WOULD LOOK DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE WE OBSERVE, PERIOD.No tiptoeing required.This message has been edited by Eta_Carinae, 06-21-2004 10:35 PM

...or knitting. It's all a conspiracy to you. The 2D models are just analogies to make the concepts easier to follow.We don't use the analogy in a calculation you idiot.What part of analogy do you not comprehend?

This is a new thread and I don't want to get into this again. But the post above shows you didn't get what I said 6 months ago. The protostar phase leaves NO evidence based upon several reasons I believe I explained in the past.Anyway - I thought if God created it 6000 years ago then he would skip that phase and *poof* there the Sun is - as it appears above us now.

because dictionaries are not physics texts!