Plasma cosmology

As with most fringe theories, it raises one hundred problems for every problem it attempts to solve. It's not worth wasting your time over. If you read through that wiki-talk on the topic, you'll see the level of complete confusion and lack of peer reviewed published material.Also, again true of most fringe theories, they are not a one hundredth as bizarre and wonderful as the main contender! This is mainly because they are based upon human ideas of "what should be", rather than allowing the maths and the science to speak for themselves.

Hmmm... I wonder from where you get that idea I've addressed this topic before but quite where it is in BB and Cosmology I have no idea! Anyone know?But please don't rest your hopes on this white-hole cosmology. Believe me, although it is based in GR, it is nonsense.

Unfortunately it's not a case of refining the model. The difficulty with WH cosmology is that it just doesn't work. Russel Humphrey's isn't quite as good at relativity as he thinks, and his model doesn't say the things he thinks it does.

I didn't see it. Have you a link?

Care to share the argument?