quote:
I'm not astute enough to judge Asmore or his opponents as to the math, et al.
So, this means you have no idea if he is correct or not, right?
quote:
Nevertheless his paradox makes more logical sense to me than the counterparts and that's what I need to go with, given the knowledge I have about it until something more sensible comes up.
In other words, you prefer to believe him, someone without a physics degree and clearly having trouble following Eta's arguments and maths, for the sole reason that you like his views better, even though you don't understand the math enough to tell if he's right or not.
Just so you know, buzsaw, this is a prime example of something Percy and others have noticed that you tend to do.
You are extremely biased towards accepting things you agree with even when you don't understand them enough to be able to judge if they are correct or not.
If you really were to be unbiased, or even just biased towards the evidence, you would simply say "I don't understand any of this physics or math to the degree needed to make a determination of who is right here.
Instead, you believe what you like
in the absence of evidence or understanding.
This is a good way to become very wrong on very many things.