Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Life on Other Planets: Is it a problem for creationists?
Lizard Breath
Member (Idle past 6725 days)
Posts: 376
Joined: 10-19-2003


Message 11 of 101 (67995)
11-20-2003 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Rei
11-18-2003 8:33 PM


Good point Rei,
When Jesus fed the multitude by creating bread and fish from one boy's lunch, he didn't create enough to bury the whole crowd waist deep in food and then say "Behold the power of God!". He only created enough to fit the need for the day to give the people enough energy to make it back to their homes. He also commanded the leftovers to be gathered which says to me that God is not wasteful and is very purposeful in what he does.
So to say that 50 billion gallaxies times 400 billion stars (I assume most gallaxies will be similiar in construction if the mechanics for their creation parellel) per galaxy would be a waste of energy for a God who bothered to collect some shreds of bread and fish heads (I would not have eaten the heads if I had been there).
From an evolutionist perspective it seems logical to me that there are as many stars as there is, in fact it would not be troubling to me if there turns out to be even more. But from a creationist perspective the volume of stars is perplexing if made by the same God as Jesus claimed to be. So not only do the other stars in general have a purpose, but based on the collection of the food scraps example, each and every star and surrounding planet out there must have a specific purpose if it holds to God's own example given of himself.
If this issue would ever be rectified within the bounds of the Creationist model, an MP3 sermon CD of it would probably outsell Michael Jackson's Thriller album. (We have to talk about MJ since he's in the news today)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Rei, posted 11-18-2003 8:33 PM Rei has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by mike the wiz, posted 11-20-2003 1:00 PM Lizard Breath has not replied

  
Lizard Breath
Member (Idle past 6725 days)
Posts: 376
Joined: 10-19-2003


Message 22 of 101 (70437)
12-01-2003 9:50 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by crashfrog
11-29-2003 6:25 PM


I think that you are making an assumption based on if God created other beings on other planets for the same purpose that he created Adam and Eve. If he created them for fellowship and for the reception of worship as he did us, then that would be interesting to know how he rectified them back to himself since Christ died once for us and it appears he can only give up certain Godly attributes only once to maintain human form through the rest of eternity.
If these other beings were created for some other purpose, then perhaps the ability to sin was not scripted into their being.
------------------
quote:
If I stand out in the woods and say something but my wife isn't there to hear it, am I still wrong?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by crashfrog, posted 11-29-2003 6:25 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024