jacketsfan4life
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 183 of 414 (110529)
05-25-2004 11:14 PM
|
Reply to: Message 182 by crashfrog 04-30-2004 2:46 AM
|
|
But see with that response you are saying that creationism is wrong completly when evolution has just as much scientific proof today as does creation. The only thing scientists can do in a lab is perform experiments on what they THINK the Earth was like billions of years ago. Were they there to actually prove it was like that billions of years ago? Nope. So then how do we know if all of these evolutionary experiments are valid then if the data for the set up of the experiment could be completely wrong? Unless you were there billions of years ago taking data on the way the atmosphere and temperatures were then how could you possibly know now how they were then.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 182 by crashfrog, posted 04-30-2004 2:46 AM | | crashfrog has replied |
|
jacketsfan4life
Inactive Member
|
Re: Ah....
true i agree with the circumstancial evidence and volcanic glass thing but that has nothing to do with evolution. People are trying to prove our very exsistance by these experiments, thats why we need more concrete evidence then just saying well i think this is what thee Earth was like billions of years ago.
|