Faith writes:
I'm no longer looking for the scientific reasoning behind such scenarios, I'm merely objecting that Joe Public is taught AS IF IT WERE KNOWN FACT what is only an imaginative scenario about the ancient untestable unrepeatable past, no matter WHAT scientific evidence supports it.
Again, as have been pointed out to you several times before in this thread, there is much more behind theese scenarios then simple imagination. You don't seam to understand that EVERY scientific theory (no exceptions) consists of a scenario (originally imagined by a human being) supported by evidence. what makes a theory a good theory is the amount of evidence supporting it. By any standards, the amount of evidence supporting the theory of evolution, the Big Bang theory, and the standard geologic interpretation of the layers of rocks on earth, is overwhelming. Indeed it's hard to find any theory better suported then the theory of evolution. In the other hand, the amount of evidence supporting the flood theory is somewhere between zip and nil. hence, anybody that believes this theory is clearly deluded (which, by the way, is the point of that thread)