Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How did Noah deal with worms?
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 17 of 113 (130699)
08-05-2004 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by johnfolton
08-05-2004 10:10 AM


whatever writes:
Mr. Jack, In a massive floating debris, you would have plenty of grass, leaves, tangled within the brush and trees floating above the waters so the worms could breathe, cause they too would be above the waters, cause the waters would flow through keeping everything moist, maintaining favorable habitats.
Actually, no. worms "breathe" by getting oxygen directly through their skin. Let us assume that somehow the worms were able to stay above water without falling off of the debris for 40 days and that they don't starve to death during that time, since it supposedly rained for 40 days and 40 nights the worms would have been constantly be wet all over during all that period. 40 days and 40 nights is more than long enough to suffocate them all.
You can do an experiment at home. Get an earthworm and put it in a glass. Put some water in but not too much. Allow enough space above for the worm to go above the water. Let it sit there for 40 days. Don't forget to keep pouring water into the glass if it starts to evaporate.
Gary, The solution to pollution might well be dilution, with all the fresh water today continually flowing into the oceans, they can not measure an increase in salinity, not that its not increasing, but Noah would of had fresh water to drink,
This is nonsense. Yes, there are a lot of rivers that flow directly into the ocean. But the ocean also loses water through evaporation. It's a never ending cycle. Water evaporate from the ocean, the evaporated water condense and rain down on land and into rivers, rivers flow back into the oceans, and the water evaporate again.
By the way, I'm just making sure, not that I want to insult your intelligence. The Na+ and Cl- ions don't evaporate along with the water. They remain with the solvent.
and the mixing action of the ocean would of buffered salinity changes preserving salt water habitats
What the hell is "mixing action of the ocean"?
corals, some if not all worms too perhaps would of survived as larvaes until conditions were right for them to hatch, many insects likely perished but too survived as larvae on these massive islands of debris that floated in mass to the massive fossil coal grave yards evident all across the world(some of these massive coal fields are hundreds of feet thick, thousands of miles long, hundreds of miles wide)depending on how the waters washed the worm habitat(floating debris) to the different respective coal yards of the world, all supporting evidence it was a world Flood.
Ignoring all the nonsense in this part, let us go back to the being wet issue. It supposedly rained for 40 days and 40 nights. That meant that everything on the surface was completely wet for 40 days and 40 nights. Wouldn't all the larvae suffocated to death, then? Larvae need oxygen too, you know.

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by johnfolton, posted 08-05-2004 10:10 AM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by johnfolton, posted 08-06-2004 1:35 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 19 of 113 (130702)
08-05-2004 1:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yaro
08-04-2004 10:26 PM


Yaro writes:
Finally, many worms are parasitic. Tapeworms, liver flukes, heart worm, etc. How did Noah bring these along? Did someone have to voluntaraly infect themselves?
I actually have to argue for the other side on this one.
Cases where people with parasitic worms, although rare in the developed countries, are quite common in undeveloped countries. I grew up in Viet Nam. Back then, having worms in your intestines didn't really mean that big of a deal. I know, now that I think about it, I don't know how I lived through all of that.
Anyway, people in the early days, especially thousands of years ago, undoubtedly didn't have the sanitation that we have today. I wouldn't be surprised if finding a tapeworm in your body in 4,000 BCE was thought to be common.

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yaro, posted 08-04-2004 10:26 PM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Yaro, posted 08-05-2004 2:22 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 24 of 113 (130735)
08-05-2004 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Yaro
08-05-2004 2:37 PM


The only thing I can think of to answer about the other parasitic worms is that they all came from whatever the worms that were inside Noah and his miserable family members. Creationists have no problem with the so-called microevolution. After all, all the parasitic worms are the same "kind".

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Yaro, posted 08-05-2004 2:37 PM Yaro has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by pink sasquatch, posted 08-05-2004 3:22 PM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 26 of 113 (130796)
08-05-2004 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by pink sasquatch
08-05-2004 3:22 PM


Well, maybe they indeed volunteered to hold those creatures inside their intestines.

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by pink sasquatch, posted 08-05-2004 3:22 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 51 of 113 (165892)
12-07-2004 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by southerngurl
12-07-2004 10:59 AM


What an odd question.

Hate world.
Revenge soon!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by southerngurl, posted 12-07-2004 10:59 AM southerngurl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by southerngurl, posted 12-07-2004 1:34 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 103 of 113 (167774)
12-13-2004 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Fishbone79
12-13-2004 4:20 PM


Re: Here ya go!
This way way way off topic. Please try to stick with the topic at hand.
You can go to this page to (1) look at my puppies and (2) use the links to your advantage.
(1)It's fun to do so.
(2)Unfortunately, the average person doesn't have the training necessary to distinquish between good science and bad science. The problem is that creationists have distorted real science and made their position seem plausible to the unwashed masses. Politicians are not scientists and they need the unwashed masses' support to get into office. If we don't do something, we could very well see the persecution of real scientists in the near future and the burnings of planetariums and laboratories.
(3)Unfortunately, the average person out there doesn't know this.
(4)Would you like me to throw you a bone?
(5)You are a few years ahead of me there.
(6)All you have to do is fly to Illinois and meet me.
(7)Duh...
This message has been edited by Lam, 12-13-2004 04:40 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Fishbone79, posted 12-13-2004 4:20 PM Fishbone79 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024