Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   COVID vaccine works - we're saved!
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 765 of 1110 (910006)
04-14-2023 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 764 by vimesey
04-14-2023 2:21 PM


Re: the Stupid Asshole
vimesey:
Have a read of this.
Just a moment...
If you disagree, present your experimental data.
Where have I seen this equation before?
When evaluating the effectiveness of masks, we want to understand and quantify their effect on the infection probability, Pinf. Assuming that every inhaled single virus (virion) has the same chance to infect a person, Pinf can be calculated by a single-hit model of infection
Pinf=1−(1−Psingle)^Nv (1)
where Psingle represents the infection probability for a single virus and Nv represents the total number of viruses to which the person is exposed (10).
It is good to see that editors of SCIENCE have finally figured out that there is an "at least one" rule. They should have learned how to apply the rule in this paper Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins. If they had, they could have explained the Weinreich paper and there would be plenty of experimental and empirical evidence to verify the use of the equation this way.
Does this equation show that masks are effective? The last paragraph tells when they will be.
Our results have important implications for understanding and communicating preventive measures against the transmission of airborne viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. When people see images or videos of millions of respiratory particles exhaled by talking or coughing, they may be afraid that simple masks with limited filtration efficiency (e.g., 30 to 70%) cannot really protect them from inhaling these particles. However, as only few respiratory particles contain viruses and most environments are in a virus-limited regime, wearing masks can keep the number of inhaled viruses in a low-Pinf regime and can explain the observed efficacy of face masks in preventing the spread of COVID-19. However, unfavorable conditions and the large variability of viral loads may lead to a virus-rich regime in certain indoor environments, such as medical centers treating COVID-19 patients. In such environments, high-efficiency masks and additional protective measures like efficient ventilation should be used to keep the infection risk low. The nonlinear dependence of mask efficacy on airborne virus concentration—i.e., the higher mask efficacy at lower virus abundance—also highlights the importance of combining masks with other preventive measures. Effective ventilation and social distancing will reduce ambient virus concentrations and increase the effectiveness of face masks in containing the virus transmission. Moreover, high compliance and correct use of masks is important to ensure the effectiveness of universal masking in reducing the reproduction number for COVID-19
Since you can't produce the data that masks have been effective, you want me to produce data that masks haven't been effective. Why haven't the institutions that track this kind of data, published their results? It couldn't be that the data shows that there is no significant benefit to the general usage of masks?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 764 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 2:21 PM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 766 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 3:43 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 767 of 1110 (910008)
04-14-2023 3:58 PM
Reply to: Message 766 by vimesey
04-14-2023 3:43 PM


Re: the Stupid Asshole
vimesey:
Once again, if you disagree, present your data.
I have presented as much data as you have presented. By the way, how is that little girl with cancer doing?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 766 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 3:43 PM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 768 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 4:04 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 769 of 1110 (910010)
04-14-2023 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 768 by vimesey
04-14-2023 4:04 PM


Re: the Stupid Asshole
vimesey:
You have presented no data. All you have is a river in Egypt.

And having kept tabs on the reports on her, she is still doing very well.

Are you genuinely so conceited, that you would rather a young girl die, than you be wrong ?
And you have presented no data. I have something much more than a river in Egypt, I have redemption, something which you don't think you need.
I am glad that she is doing well.
If you think that I would rather a young girl dies, you would be very wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 768 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 4:04 PM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 770 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 5:09 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 771 of 1110 (910012)
04-14-2023 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 770 by vimesey
04-14-2023 5:09 PM


Re: the Stupid Asshole
vimesey:
The data are all there in the references - look them up.

And she hasn't died. So do you therefore admit you are wrong ?
Is that why you don't post the data?
There are many things that you don't understand. One of those things is that God determines the number of days of our lives. Your hope is that she lives a long life just to prove me wrong. My hope is that she live long enough to know that Jesus Christ is her redeemer, whether she lives only a short time or a long time. No matter what you say, she will die and so will you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 770 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 5:09 PM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 772 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 5:55 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 773 of 1110 (910020)
04-14-2023 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 772 by vimesey
04-14-2023 5:55 PM


Re: the Stupid Asshole
vimesey:
The data are there - look them up.

And yes, we all die. But she will live a longer life, thanks to intelligent, kind, brilliant scientists, who have no religious agenda. You're flailing and failing Kleinman - and are pointing to religious dogma with no empirical evidence, in a vain effort to support the crap you've swallowed all your life.

I'm off to bed now - I'll leave you to carry on with your pathetic mewling.
If the data was there, you would post it, but you don't.
Yes, we all die no matter what science does.
And you better wear your mask to bed so that you won't die.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 772 by vimesey, posted 04-14-2023 5:55 PM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 774 by vimesey, posted 04-15-2023 1:45 AM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 776 of 1110 (910027)
04-15-2023 8:19 AM
Reply to: Message 774 by vimesey
04-15-2023 1:45 AM


Re: the Stupid Asshole
vimesey:
Well, another day dawns, and we have yet another step forward in the fight against cancer, based on a deep understanding of how million year old retroviruses that have nested in our DNA can be awakened by cancerous cell growth, prompting the immune system to target and fight the cancerous cells. Have a read here:

Million-year-old viruses help fight cancer, say scientists - BBC News

and here:

Antibodies against endogenous retroviruses promote lung cancer immunotherapy | Nature

Ah, Kleinman - the evidence against your sad religious fantasy just keeps growing and growing, doesn't it ?
You still haven't posted any data that masks work. When are you going to order people to wear tin foil hats.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 774 by vimesey, posted 04-15-2023 1:45 AM vimesey has not replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 777 of 1110 (910028)
04-15-2023 8:21 AM
Reply to: Message 775 by xongsmith
04-15-2023 3:25 AM


Re: the Stupid Asshole
vimesey as reported by xongsmith:
Well, another day dawns...links to new research
xongsmith:
But the Stupid Asshole will just whine "where's the data?"
LOL LOL LOL

So you notice that as well in vimesey's post, no data that masks work?
xongsmith doesn't need data or experimentation for his scientific research.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 775 by xongsmith, posted 04-15-2023 3:25 AM xongsmith has not replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 779 of 1110 (910031)
04-15-2023 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 778 by Percy
04-15-2023 9:02 AM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
Kleinman:
Explain to us why influenza vaccines are changed every year.
Percy:
This has already been done. If you're unsatisfied with the answers already provided in this thread then you should point out where they're wrong or incomplete and provide better answers.

Where has descent with modification and adaptation been explained?
Kleinman:
And tell us why Covid vaccines are not 100% effective.
Percy:
Again, if you're unsatisfied with the answers already provided in this thread then tell us what you believe the correct answers are.

It's all about descent with modification and adaptation. Vaccines are selection pressures and when you have diversity in the population, vaccines won't be universally effective if resistant variants are in the population.
Kleinman:
I can't help it if members of your forum jump to conclusions.
Percy:
We can't help it if you're a font of unsupported self-serving accusations.

Perhaps so, but I do know how descent with modification and adaptation works. And it is the reason that influenza vaccines have to be changed every year and why Covid vaccines are not 100% effective.
Kleinman:
Perhaps you think that descent with modification and adaptation increases the efficacy of vaccines (or drugs, or any other kind of selection pressure).
Percy:
Since no one who's touched on this subtopic has said anything that even remotely hints at such an opinion, it is baffling that you would say this. Your most common strategy seems to be to falsely imply in a mocking way that someone holds an absurd opinion.

Try not to be so mockable.
Kleinman:
My position on vaccines is that it is one of the best medical treatments physicians have to offer. But, I also tell my patients that there is a small risk associated with vaccination. The person may have an adverse reaction to the vaccine and that reaction can be severe. My hope is that pharmaceutical companies and government agencies that monitor the production of such drugs will test their products extensively to verify the safety and efficacy of their product. I'm not so sure this happened with the development and marketing of the Covid vaccine...
Percy:
The covid vaccines were approved early before all safety trials had been completed due to the urgency of dealing with the pandemic. Much more data has been gathered since the vaccines were first introduced.

This is anecdotal, but while I personally knew people who died of covid, and I know people still suffering long covid, I don't know anyone hurt by the vaccine. Combining that with what can be found online, my impression is that covid vaccines are pretty safe. If you think they're not safe maybe you can tell us what health problems the vaccines are causing, and what active ingredients in the vaccines is suspected of causing them.

Was the urgency due to fear and overreaction to a perceived threat? I know people that have died after catching influenza. Should all the policies instituted for Covid be instituted for influenza? Vaccines are pretty safe because they undergo extensive testing based on years of experience using these drugs. Fear is not a good reason to discard this experience and push out a vaccine that hasn't been fully tested.
Kleinman:
...as attested to by the stories of normally healthy people suddenly dying after being given the vaccine.
Percy:
There's a good reason that anecdotal data is never used in studies. It can certainly be used as justification for initiating further study but is not scientific.

Why don't the agencies responsible post the data?
Kleinman:
It takes time to collect this kind of data and I don't think that the pharmaceutical companies and government agencies responsible are highly motivated to collect such data.
Percy:
A CDC page you might find helpful is Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines. Given the couple hundred million people who have received the vaccine, many also receiving boosters, it would take a million people suffering adverse effects just to reach the .5% level.

Do the math with your own numbers. 0.5%*100,000,000=500,000 people with adverse reactions for every 100,000,000 vaccinated. How many people got COVID and died from the disease (these numbers are questionable because the death rate from cancer, heart disease, and other causes dropped since COVID is being reported). Then you might understand why some people refused the vaccine, the risk-benefit ratio was not good enough for them to take the vaccine. But people like you want these people to lose their jobs and have them locked up because they will spread a contagious disease. Why not fire and lock up those that got the vaccine but still spread the disease?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 778 by Percy, posted 04-15-2023 9:02 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 780 by xongsmith, posted 04-15-2023 11:38 AM Kleinman has replied
 Message 815 by Percy, posted 04-16-2023 11:20 AM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 781 of 1110 (910034)
04-15-2023 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 780 by xongsmith
04-15-2023 11:38 AM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
xongsmith continues to have difficulty posting the data that general usage of masks was effective in preventing the spread of Covid (or any other infectious disease).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 780 by xongsmith, posted 04-15-2023 11:38 AM xongsmith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 782 by vimesey, posted 04-15-2023 12:58 PM Kleinman has replied
 Message 784 by xongsmith, posted 04-15-2023 1:17 PM Kleinman has replied
 Message 787 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-15-2023 1:25 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 783 of 1110 (910039)
04-15-2023 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 782 by vimesey
04-15-2023 12:58 PM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
vimesey:
Took me all of 60 seconds to find this study in The Lancet:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/...ticle/pii/S0140673620311429

The data show that masks help to reduce the spread of covid, which helped whilst the vaccine was developed.

Are you genuinely too scared of being shown to be wrong to do your own research ?

On the plus side, it's a lot of fun seeing you constantly try to support your fantasies through unevidenced denial and misapplied mathematics.
Where in your quote do you post the data that shows that the general usage of masks was effective in preventing the spread of Covid (or any other infectious disease).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 782 by vimesey, posted 04-15-2023 12:58 PM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 785 by vimesey, posted 04-15-2023 1:22 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 786 of 1110 (910042)
04-15-2023 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 784 by xongsmith
04-15-2023 1:17 PM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
xongsmith still can't post the data that the general usage of masks prevents the spread of Covid or any other infectious disease.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 784 by xongsmith, posted 04-15-2023 1:17 PM xongsmith has not replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 788 of 1110 (910044)
04-15-2023 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 785 by vimesey
04-15-2023 1:22 PM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
vimesey:
It's in the posted piece. Read it.
From your link:
Interpretation The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support physical distancing of 1 m or more and provide quantitative estimates for models and contact tracing to inform policy. Optimum use of face masks, respirators, and eye protection in public and health-care settings should be informed by these findings and contextual factors. Robust randomised trials are needed to better inform the evidence for these interventions, but this systematic appraisal of currently best available evidence might inform interim guidance.
And why can't you post the data that shows that the general usage of masks prevented the spread of Covid or any other infectious disease? If you have the data, post it, but you don't have the data. Perhaps you think everyone should wear hazmat suits?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 785 by vimesey, posted 04-15-2023 1:22 PM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 794 by vimesey, posted 04-15-2023 2:56 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 789 of 1110 (910045)
04-15-2023 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 787 by Tanypteryx
04-15-2023 1:25 PM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
Tanypteryx:
Next Kleinman will explain how properly worn masks cause diseases and how they are in fact, the cause of all diseases, but first he's going to shove a UV laser up his ass.
I'll do that right after you explain how descent with modification and adaptation works. Show us how well-trained a biologist is in science and mathematics.
And Tany can't post the data that shows that the general usage of masks prevents the spread of Covid or any other infectious disease either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 787 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-15-2023 1:25 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 790 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-15-2023 1:48 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 791 of 1110 (910047)
04-15-2023 2:03 PM
Reply to: Message 790 by Tanypteryx
04-15-2023 1:48 PM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
Tanypteryx:
And Kleinman says masks cause all disease.
I don't say that Tany, I say that you are the typical biologist that doesn't understand how biological evolution works. Of course, you could prove me wrong by explaining how descent with modification and adaptation works. But to do that, you would need some scientific and mathematical training which you haven't gotten.
And you still don't post the data that shows that the general usage of masks prevented the spread of Covid or any other infectious diseases.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 790 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-15-2023 1:48 PM Tanypteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 792 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-15-2023 2:08 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 366 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 793 of 1110 (910049)
04-15-2023 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 792 by Tanypteryx
04-15-2023 2:08 PM


Re: The Right to Spread Disease
Tanypteryx:
Of course you do. Next you'll tell us all about the covid vaccines killing everyone who received it. It's in the math.
Tany can't post any data that shows that the general usage of masks prevented the spread of Covid or any other infectious diseases, nor can he post any quotes of me where I've said anything that he claims I've said. Too bad Tany can't explain how descent with modification and adaptation works, but that should be expected, he was trained as a biologist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 792 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-15-2023 2:08 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 795 by xongsmith, posted 04-15-2023 2:58 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024