First side effect of the gay marriage ruling

The Supreme Court used section one of the fourteenth amendment to justify their ruling for gay marriage, it reads like this;

quote:

---

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

---

Now that gay marriage is legal in all 50 states, doesn't this ruling now mean that ALL states must recognize concealed carry permission, no matter what state issued the permit?http://bearingarms.com/...onwide-concealed-carry-reciprocityWhat do gun controllers think about this? Is it wrong? Should something be done about it? Was the gay marriage thing not such a good idea after all?

Regulate how? It's either legal or its not.

I was just wondering what the first knee-jerk reactions would be from the far left - I got my answers!This has been spreading around over the weekend, this evening I found this on FB;http://www.ijreview.com/...nationwide-legal-experts-weigh-inLooks like it will take some time if it gets anywhere, will probably take a lot of time and money. But it will be interesting to see how some other things are held up against this ruling, I've been hearing about "right to work" laws possibly gaining some strength from it.

Yes, he looks like the gay one!

Yes, you're a gun owner who loves gun control, a Christian who hates Christians, it figures you'd claim conservatism too. You're a good kind of phony, most everyone sees right through you.