Summations Only

You missed this quote from Gould:

quote:

---

Since we proposed punctuated equilibria to explain trends, it is infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists —whether through design or stupidity, I do not know -- as admitting that the fossil record includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level, but they are abundant between larger groups.

---

My bold.Gould, Stephen Jay 1983. "Evolution as Fact and Theory" in Hens Teeth and Horse's Toes: Further Reflections in Natural History. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., p. 258-260.

Now you are being dishonest about Darwin,too! While, in reality, Darwin wrote: p 410fhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=tex...Please stop being dishonest. You’re doing your religion a disservice by your dishonesty.

quote:

---

The point however, remains, that the fossil record is in agreement with creation, and rebuffs evolution.
  —Eliyahuh

---

Au contraire.What's the creationist explanation for the biological assemblage zones in the Beaufort Group of the Karoo Sequence?You can find out more about them starting at Karoo Supergroup - WikipediaIt goes like this from bottom (1) to top (7):
1. Dinocephalian.
2. Pristerognathus-Diictodon
3. Tropidostoma-Endothiodon
4. Aulacephalodon-Cistecepthalus
5. Dicynodon Lacerticeps- Whaitsia
6. Lystrosaurus-Thrinaxodon
7. Kannemeyeria-DiademodonIt goes from the Permian Adelaide subgroup (bottom) to the Triassic Tarkastad subgroup (top).Oh, and don't even try to find a creationist 'explanation' for them. They haven't even tried yet, apart from claiming some vague references to a magical Fluddy.And also be very careful in explaining those jaw bones, from a creationist 'worldview'. Jaw bones don't get 'hydrologically sorted' not even without the rest of the fossils...Oh, and if you want it, I can privately send you copies (if the mods allow it) of the pages of where I got my information from . Pages 535 to 548 of South African Committee for Stratigraphy (SACS), 1980. Stratigraphy of South Africa. Part 1 (Comp. L.E. Kent). Lithostratigraphy of the Republics of South Africa, South West Africa (Namibia), and the Republics of Bophutatswana, Transkei and Venda: Handb. geol. Surv. S. Afr., 8In it there's also a whole list of peer-reviewd geological and palaeontoloical articles on the subject (at least 78 direct references). I can also send you more than 30 more recent references on the subject. Your pick.Edited by Pressie, : Changed the references.