|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Junior Member (Idle past 3496 days) Posts: 28 From: Australia Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Was Jesus' crucifixion all part of God's plan? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Jesus Himself challenged the Pharisees to prove that He sinned.
John 8:34-4 writes:
34 Jesus replied, "I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. 35 Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. 36 So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. 37 I know you are Abraham's descendants. Yet you are ready to kill me, because you have no room for my word. 38 I am telling you what I have seen in the Father's presence, and you do what you have heard from your father." 39 "Abraham is our father," they answered. "If you were Abraham's children," said Jesus, "then you would do the things Abraham did. 40 As it is, you are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things. 41 You are doing the things your own father does." "We are not illegitimate children," they protested. "The only Father we have is God himself." 42 Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me. 43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. 45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me! 46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don't you believe me? 47 He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God." It is my contention that anyone who sees Jesus as simply human is of the same mind as these misled Jews.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
He challenged them; He didn't say they would fail to prove it. Jesus Himself challenged the Pharisees to prove that He sinned. Earlier in the same chapter:
quote:None of them cast a stone. Neither did He. He didn't claim to be without sin.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
There is another point that should be emphasized.
The Jesus described in John's Gospel is entirely different than the Jesus found in the Synoptic Gospels, far more narcissistic, doing miracles to show power, claiming divinity, less a humanitarian and less human.Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
jar writes: This is where your faith and my faith differ. Your faith is in logic, reason, and reality. You seem to think that any human that accepts answers (as faith) is engaging in wishful thinking. The Jesus described in John's Gospel is entirely different than the Jesus found in the Synoptic Gospels, far more narcissistic, doing miracles to show power, claiming divinity, less a humanitarian and less human. I would say that the Jesus in the Bible is absolute, since He is the living word. Of course, you would believe that human wisdom has uncovered redactors and human inspired passages as opposed to scriptural inerrancy. How do you know that it is not scriptural inerrancy? The Jesus in the Bible has different aspects to his character, emphasized by different authors. So too the God of the Bible.
Where then,do we begin? The answer is not so difficult. We must begin with the people who created the literature. This point may seem so obvious as to sound stupid. But the point must be made. Until a literature has been created we can only see a silent people. To a large extent this is true of the Stone Age man, for example. Men of the Stone Age may have felt and hoped, but what they felt and hoped we shall never know, for they left us no words, no literature. The people who produced the Bible were not, however, a silent people. (...)Critics often accuse the OT God of being cruel, yet the God written about is written through later authors who codified the tales told around the campfire. Thus, God was not directly written of....He was written of through the lens of the believers of that time. Not so, with Jesus. By the time of Jesus, we had direct witnesses and no mere tales told around campfires. Thus, the Jesus that was written of...even by unbelievers such as Josephus was well known within the context of that society. It seems to me that those of you who expose redactors seem to think that these writers...if they even existed, were tarnishing and changing the mythos of the character. I would disagree, and say that these writers were expressing how much the culture had embraced the character...the hero of the story.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
This is where your faith and my faith differ. Your faith is in logic, reason, and reality. You seem to think that any human that accepts answers (as faith) is engaging in wishful thinking. Sorry but no faith is needed or even useful. I'm talking fact, what the actual words say.
I would say that the Jesus in the Bible is absolute, since He is the living word. Of course, you would believe that human wisdom has uncovered redactors and human inspired passages as opposed to scriptural inerrancy. How do you know that it is not scriptural inerrancy? The Jesus in the Bible has different aspects to his character, emphasized by different authors. So too the God of the Bible. That's nice but again, irrelevant. The fact is that the Jesus described in John is entirely different than what is found in the three other gospels. This has nothing to do with faith or belief nor is it anything not commonly accepted. The gospels have traditionally been divided into the Synoptic gospels and John. And then you fall off into jabberwocky when you pratter on about "I believe that the author of John knew Jesus on a deeper level...and was not making stories up." What the hell is a deeper level? What do any of your posts have to do with the topic?Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
jar writes: It involves bias, generated by faith. It is not cold, calculated logic which allows no such emotion.
What the hell is a deeper level?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
So it has nothing to do with truth or facts or anything but emotion. Got it.
I notice you seem to have ignored all the other points in the post. Is that too an indication of a deeper level?Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
My point involves the motivation of the authors. The intentions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
What does that have to do with what was actually written; the fact that the Jesus described in John is entirely different than the Jesus than found in the synoptic gospels or to the topic of the thread?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member (Idle past 336 days) Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
What does that have to do with what was actually written; the fact that the Jesus described in John is entirely different than the Jesus than found in the synoptic gospels or to the topic of the thread? my guess is that in some writings he dies on the cross forgiving the people doing that to him, in some writings he actually stands beside the cross in some spirit form laughing at their attempts to murder god, in some he tells Judas he is a special disciple that will sacrifice him, in some he is sad he betrayed him for 30 silver pieces, ...... Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand What are the Christians gonna do to me ..... Forgive me, good luck with that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Reading that kinda reminds me of David Koresh.
Edited by AZPaul3, : clearer?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Reading that kinda reminds me of David Koresh. How long did you live with him?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
How long did you live with him? 51 days. When the FBI agreed to his request for a radio address the Dallas stations carried his live rambling "I am the second coming," "I tell you truth but you do not hear," "I am the son of god and the son of man" soliloquy. I was driving from Ft. Worth back to my office in Dallas at the time and a late snowstorm had tied up traffic. Kept me entertained.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
jar writes: Humanity does not have the spirit nor the intelligence to judge the Bible...specifically Jesus. I realize that you think differently, but though God may have given you a brain He does not expect you to try and outthink the words that He gave us. Look at the fruit of what you are doing. You fragment the Bible and cause people to doubt the message and the story. I suppose once you have caused people to question and doubt that you feel your job is done?
What does that have to do with what was actually written; the fact that the Jesus described in John is entirely different than the Jesus than found in the synoptic gospels or to the topic of the thread?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
But that is NOT what the Bible says Phat as you would know if you had read it.
The Bible says that we do have the spirit and knowledge needed to question even God. In fact man has always judged the Bible which is why there is no such thing as "The Bible" or "Universal Canon". Humanity decided what books to include, what to exclude and not just once but repeatedly and without agreement beyond the first five books of the Old Testament. But again Phat, what does that have to do with the topic which is " Was Jesus' crucifixion all part of God's plan?" or what was actually written; the fact that the Jesus described in John is entirely different than the Jesus found in the synoptic gospels?
I realize that you think differently, but though God may have given you a brain He does not expect you to try and outthink the words that He gave us. But Phat, it is not the words in the Bible I question, rather I keep saying read what is actually written, not what someone says it should say.
Look at the fruit of what you are doing. You fragment the Bible and cause people to doubt the message and the story. Well doubt is a great step, but it is only a first step. Look at what I actually say. I don't tell you what to think or believe, I only tell you to actually read what the Bible says and compare what is actually written to the story in the the snake oil salesmen shpiels.
I suppose once you have caused people to question and doubt that you feel your job is done? No, as I said that is just the very baby step. So can we head back towards the topic and stop misrepresenting my position and posts?Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024