As you started with the off topic posts and attacks, I believe it is incumbent upon you to address the points and not make attacks.
or liberals like Hilary Clinton
Something else you are clueless and uneducated about. Hillary Clinton is no liberal.
Its always more interesting in debate when a person actually address the argument you made.
There was no argument made. I was pointing out that your lack of knowledge what fascism is made you look like a buffoon.
My guess is that just like the NT thread, youll make few idiotic comments then bow out.
Pot meet kettle.
fascism starts with an ideology
Yes, finally something that is correct.
exacally the one I discribed in that context
First of all the words are "exactly" and "described". Next, you didn't describe an ideology. All you did was attack people as being fascists when you had no idea what the term even means. Since you seem incapable of actually checking the meaning of the term I will give you a couple links. Maybe you can read them and get back to us.
Fascism - WikipediaFascism Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
Fascist is not a term you can accurately use to make the point you are trying to make.
Address the points I made
You made no on topic posts.
I was pointing out that your post had no validity, because you were obviously ignorant about the term fascism. Are these people fascists or liberals? They can not be both.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.