Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Muslims promote Sharia law. Why do Christians not promote their law?
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 45 of 112 (704231)
08-06-2013 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by ringo
08-01-2013 1:06 PM


Don't forget the whole gay killing bits.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by ringo, posted 08-01-2013 1:06 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 46 of 112 (704232)
08-06-2013 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by marc9000
08-01-2013 6:48 PM


You mean 613 commandments.
Otherwise you would be letting the gays and wizards off.
Marc writes:
Christianity and Islam aren't really comparable. The Koran promotes violence against unbelievers as an ongoing law, the Bible does not. Old Testament history is just that, history, not promotion.
Matthew 10:21 And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.
Ta da!
with all its associated environmentalism, redistribution of wealth, and big government.
So you want and foul planet, more poor people and faceless corporations running the country?
Just wow.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by marc9000, posted 08-01-2013 6:48 PM marc9000 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Jon, posted 08-07-2013 6:22 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 48 of 112 (704253)
08-07-2013 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Jon
08-07-2013 6:22 AM


Re: Misquoting Proves Nothing
Who is being put to death in Matt 10:21 as a result of Jesus' decisions?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Jon, posted 08-07-2013 6:22 AM Jon has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by jar, posted 08-07-2013 9:15 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 50 of 112 (704265)
08-07-2013 6:30 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by jar
08-07-2013 9:15 AM


Re: Misquoting Proves Nothing
He sends his own followers out to certain death to do his PR for him?
Man, that's cold.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by jar, posted 08-07-2013 9:15 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by jar, posted 08-07-2013 6:51 PM Larni has not replied
 Message 52 by Jon, posted 08-07-2013 10:05 PM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 96 of 112 (704579)
08-12-2013 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by marc9000
08-10-2013 10:13 PM


marc writes:
but homosexual marriage is bad for society,
Exactly how is it bad for society? I can't see how it could be.
marc writes:
But he shouldn't have the right to the public institution of marriage, if the majority sees it as a public burden.
Like those dastardly black and white folks wanting to get married pre 1967 in America or pre 15th Century Britain?
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by marc9000, posted 08-10-2013 10:13 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024