Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dating services and foreign women
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(3)
Message 30 of 174 (686093)
12-28-2012 8:43 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by foreveryoung
12-27-2012 2:26 PM


I want to catch them in the act of their deception.
Just a thought but is the desire to be right overshadowing your desire to get on with people?
If there is any thing I've learnt from my past relationships and my clinical experience is that going out of one's way to be acknowledged as 'right' pisses people off, no end.
If you are more interested in being right, getting things right, being seen as right and perhaps most importantly making sure other people know that you are right and they are wrong, that's going to push people away.
Just my two penneth worth (as a psychotherapist).
All the best.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by foreveryoung, posted 12-27-2012 2:26 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 34 of 174 (686114)
12-29-2012 5:25 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by dwise1
12-29-2012 4:27 AM


For another, she had warned me about a number of women's "borderline personalities" that I would need to look out for, so I was to report my experiences with these women back to her so that she could analyze them and point out the problems and presence of those borderline personalities. I found that I could not do what she wanted me to do and her stories of borderline personalities only served to reinforce my suspicions.
Bad counsellor.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by dwise1, posted 12-29-2012 4:27 AM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by dwise1, posted 12-29-2012 5:59 AM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024