nj writes:
If someone wants to swear in using the Qur'an, the Bible, Bill Clinton's autobiography, or nothing at all, that should be their prerogative.
Personally I don't see what the big stink is about in either case. If the Muslim wants to swear in using the Qur'an, let him. If Goode wants to argue his point, let him.
I almost agree, nj.
I wonder, though, a little bit about the tone of "the Muslim"...
Though I agree that Goode has the right to speak his mind, his comments about immigration are patently dishonest, since they are irrelevant, and his remarks about how past swearing-in ceremonies have been conducted are patently dishonest because they lead folks to believe that Goode is planning something unprecedented and radical.
To the extent that his xenophobia confirms the strongest doubts about America's intentions among the world's Muslims, he has betrayed not just the ideals but also the best interests of his own nation.
The reasonable middle ground is not the mid-point between right and wrong: Goode is wrong. He is pandering to the worst of human impulses, the hatred and fear of difference.
No one has the right to stop "the Muslim" from taking his private oath as he pleases; no one has the right to stop Goode from speaking his mind. But everyone has the right to label Goode's un-American bigotry for what it is, and his constituents have the right to exact a price in the voting booth. I hope they do.
Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!---------------------------------------