It's only stupid from the evolutionist's perspective. In any flood, more mobile creatures survive the longest. No?
No.
From the floodist perspective, the reason there are relatively few mammal, bird and mankind fossils is that they were the most mobile. That makes sense. No?
No. Example. plesiosaurs and dolphins. Same size, same shape, same habitat, but never found together in the fossil record.
Also Stegosaurs and elephants. Same size, same environment, same diet, never found anywhere near each other in the fossil record.
There's lots of examples if you actually
look rather than makig stuff up.
Hey, Buz, while you're here, if a sedimentary layer is sandwiched between two igneous layers, and the lower igneous layer dates to 100 million years, and the upper igneous layer dates to 90 million years, do you really think we can't conclude that the sedimentary layer is between 90 and 100 million years old?