EvC Forum: Im New here. Evolutionist or Creationist site?

Chuck77 writes:

I just seen this message from a poster "I dont think bias is the problem i think PRATTS are a problem so many creo ideas have been refuted a gazzilion times that it is better for their belief if they dont visit such sites. "

So, my question is are the Creationists intruding here or is it an equal place to come to as far as Creationists and Evo's? IS there really a bias? Or is it simply a site for both parties to discuss topics? It seems already to me that Evo's feel they run the place and Creationists are morons who shouldn't be here. Am I wrong?

Hi Chuck. Welcome.

Astute creationists who are studied on the Bible and history see evidence supportive to the existence of a higher intelligence in the Universe than is experienced on our level of existence. These evidences include phenomenally fulfilled prophecy prophesying unusual events which have come to pass and are emerging into existence.

We look for archeological evidence of phenomenal events recorded in the Biblical record, such as the Exodus crossing. This has been extensively debated in several threads. If you click on my username you will see my profile which has a number of pages in it, having been aboard over eight years. You may want to visit the last one which is still open and ongoing. Perhaps you may want to weigh in on it.

We also look for evidence supportive to the Noaic Flood event that may be a better explanation for physical things observed, etc.

Some of us see Robert Ballard's Black Sea discovery of evidence of civilization 300' lower than the land surface as evidence of the Genesis flood.

Creationists tend to debate logic whereas evolutionists tend towards more abstract methodology such as relativity, quantum theory and such. An example of logical argument, the creationist may argue that by and large, both order and disorder trends towards disorder naturally and not vise versa. Evolutionists see disorder emerging naturally and randomly into more complex order whereas creationists logically cite the need for intelligent work in order for disorder and chaos to become more orderly, complex and less chaotic

It has been noted that evolutionists tend to be more scientifically educated and astute, therefore in unity. However consider that having had their young impressive minds run through the assembly line of scientific methodology and interpretation of things observed, they have become unified. Creationist's, who's views are not generally allowed in the schools, sometimes cite this as the reason for unity of thought among evolutionists.

So Chuck, don't think that just because gazillions seem to refute creationist arguments, they have a corner, so to speak on reality and truth. Remember; for any of them to admit to even a smidget of evidence supportive to the existence of the supernatural higher intelligence, would falsify their secularistic version of science and render them accountable to a higher authority.

We would welcome you to join in on the ongoing debates, both regarding science and the many other interesting topics promoted here at EvC.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

2 online now:	PaulK, Phat
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1