Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is it VERSUS?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2982 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 5 of 103 (602812)
01-31-2011 9:45 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Andrew Day
01-31-2011 6:45 PM


Re: Revised proposal edit
I am agnostic and believe in a creator or creators
Then you are not agnostic. You seem to be leaning toward deism.
But you're right, they shouldn't be exclusive, and for the most part they are not. I think the "C" in EvC is more refering to the "creationist" of the biblical persuation. Literalists.
There are many here who view it as you do, that some "thing" got the initial spark going then (it varies from this point) either left our universe to do whatever it does, or, played an active role in guilding the process from stars, to galaxies and solar systems, then further along in abiogenesis and finally, evolution.
Seems pointless to me to go that route, but that is just my opinion. Many here are satisfied with holding that belief and never reject what has been learned and studied by scientist.
With the biblical literalist, who reject evolution, you'll find one fact that is equal for all of them: None of them are biologist. None. I think they feel this is like that show House where, if given the right lines, anyone can play a doctor.
Hope this helped...
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Andrew Day, posted 01-31-2011 6:45 PM Andrew Day has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by slevesque, posted 02-01-2011 2:29 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2982 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 10 of 103 (602846)
02-01-2011 8:49 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by slevesque
02-01-2011 2:29 AM


Re: Revised proposal edit
you talking about the creationists on this forum, or creationists in general here ?
Here in this forum I meant.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by slevesque, posted 02-01-2011 2:29 AM slevesque has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2982 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 27 of 103 (603091)
02-02-2011 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by mike the wiz
02-02-2011 10:35 AM


Re: I am what I am
It is very clear and simple to understand design intellectually. I am guessing you have not read about design by scientists that believe in design rather than evolution?
It's not the "design" part that is disputed. It is fine to say animals are designed to function as they do.
The issue comes up when the design(er) is said to be something other than natural mechanisms working within the framework of reality. Nature designs magnificant things; invisible agents are not needed. Especially one particular brand of agent from the religion you happen to believe in.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by mike the wiz, posted 02-02-2011 10:35 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by mike the wiz, posted 02-02-2011 5:59 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2982 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 37 of 103 (603117)
02-02-2011 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by mike the wiz
02-02-2011 5:59 PM


Re: I am what I am
Sure - believe that designer is something natural, like an alien, that would atleast be a designer.
Yeah sure, that would be one form of natural designer.
But what is it about nature itself that doesn't allow it to design as well?
I love the way nature designed those beautiful ferraris.
But it did design the ferraris. The Italian designer was born from two parents who had sex, fertilized an egg, carried said egg to full term, then gave birth to it.
Human beings are part of nature, are they not?
Onifre, if nature can't create a knife and fork...
I believe it can do all of those things, but there is a process.
First you need a big bang. Then you need stars to form. Then you need galaxies to form and the universe to cool down. Then you need stars to go supernovea to create the rest of the elements after hydrogen and helium. Then you need solar systems to form, planets to form with the essential elements, and one of those planets to be at the precise distance from it's host star. Then you need abiogenesis, which should lead to evolution. Then you need a long evolutionary process from single cell to multi-cellular life. Then you need one of these multi-cellular organisms to evolve enough intelligence to grasp the concept of automotive engineering, knife making, and fork making and use. Then you get the ferrari, the knife, the fork, etc.
Skip anyone of these steps, and none of those things get created. Naturally.
You are asking me to believe that nature can win the world cup when it cannot even kick a football.
What was so unnatural about the World Cup? I know you brits want to believe Spain had supernatural power, but trust me, they were all human beings.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by mike the wiz, posted 02-02-2011 5:59 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024