Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Golden Age of biblical principles?
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 61 of 144 (590368)
11-07-2010 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
11-07-2010 7:23 PM


Conquered territory?
It has long been, also the most benevolent nation ever, sacrificing our best young men in wars, liberating the oppressed, without grabbing those nations and adding them to our, empire as Russia did, i.e the block of Communist nations, including East Germany in the last century.
So are you claiming that the Golden Age begins AFTER the US stops taking land by conquest? If so, where do you place that date? After the 1890s? After the overthrow and conquest of Hawaii? After the conquest of the last Native Americans? After the Spanish American War?
Do you consider the fact that we are still occupying lands that were given to other Nations under Treaty?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 11-07-2010 7:23 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 763 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 62 of 144 (590369)
11-07-2010 7:58 PM


Has anyone mentioned Franklin D. Roosevelt yet? His era was as good as we've ever had as far as New Testament/Do Unto Others/Good Samaritan stuff with "doing unto the least of these" Jesusy sort of things.
Buz, are you going to claim the New Deal?

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Chiroptera, posted 11-07-2010 8:10 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 144 (590373)
11-07-2010 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by Coragyps
11-07-2010 7:58 PM


Buz, are you going to claim the New Deal?
Why not? Don't evangelical Christians already claim to have invented democracy? And civil liberties?

You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists. -- Abbie Hoffman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Coragyps, posted 11-07-2010 7:58 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9199
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 64 of 144 (590375)
11-07-2010 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 6:32 PM


Re: Is that your answer?
here is a simple one for a simple person.
All your insults do is make you continue to look like a fool.
Did you even read the OP? Did you read what Buz said? If you don't agree with Buz then just say so. But do not try to change the premise this thread or hijack into a thread so you can just continue to spout nonsense and insults.
How can you contentions concerning Christianity and its success be anything but relative andhow does your disagreement of mine make Christianity wrong and/or unsucessful?
What does the have to do with the thread? Take your off topic crap elsewhere.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 6:32 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:53 PM Theodoric has replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9199
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 65 of 144 (590376)
11-07-2010 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
11-07-2010 7:23 PM


When?
During the golden age many were not Christians and many were outlaws etc, but it was an era when the Christian majority influenced the mindset of folks in power towards Christian Biblical principles.
When was this time? You keep on saying there was such a time, but as of yet you refuse to tell us when it was.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 11-07-2010 7:23 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9199
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 66 of 144 (590377)
11-07-2010 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 6:37 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Because the answer is always going to be relative, depending on who is viewing the results
No shit.
Why can you not see this point.
What makes you think I can not see this point? Please show that I do not understand that the answer is "relative". If you cannot then quit suggesting I cannot.
If I am wrong define what success would be for Christianity and watch me disagree
Really not sure what sentence 3 has to do with sentence 1 and 2. But then again word salad and non sequiturs seem to be your specialties.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 6:37 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 313 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 67 of 144 (590379)
11-07-2010 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
11-07-2010 7:23 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Mmm, no, Dr Adequate, that's never been my position.
Okay, then you can stop lamenting the Golden Age which didn't actually exist.
It has long been, also the most benevolent nation ever, sacrificing our best young men in wars, liberating the oppressed, without grabbing those nations and adding them to our, empire as Russia did, i.e the block of Communist nations, including East Germany in the last century.
I can think of some people who might disagree with that.
For example, the A'ananin, the Abenaki, the Absaalooke, the Achumawi, the Acjachemen, the Acoma, the Agua Caliente, the Adai, the Ahtna, the Ajachemen, the Akimel O'odham, the Akwaala, the Alabama-Coushatta, the Aleut, the Alutiiq, the Algonquians, the Alliklik, the Alnobak, the Alsea, the Andaste, the Anishinaabe, the Aniyunwiya, the Antoniao, the Apache, the Apalachee, the Applegate, the Apsaalooke, the Arapaho, the Arawak, the Arikara, the Assiniboine, the Atakapa, the Atikamekw, the Atsina, the Atsugewi, the Araucano, the Avoyel, the Ayisiyiniwok, the Aymara, the Aztecs, the Babine, the Bannock, the Barbareo, the Bari, the Bear River tribe, the Beaver tribe, the Bella Bella, the Bella Coola, the Beothuks, the Bidai, the Biloxi, the Black Carib, the Blackfoot, the Blood Indians, the Bora, the Caddo, the Cahita, the Cahto, the Cahuilla, the Calapooya, the Calusa, the Carib, the Carquin, the Carrier, the Caska, the Catawba, the Cathlamet, the Cayuga, the Cayuse, the Celilo, the Central Pomo, the Chahta, the Chalaque, the Chappaquiddick, the Chawchila, the Chehalis, the Chelan, the Chemehuevi, the Cheraw, the Cheroenhaka, the Cherokee, the Chetco, the Cheyenne, the Chickamaugan, the Chickasaw, the Chilcotin, the Chilula-Wilkut, the Chimariko, the Chinook, the Chipewyan, the Chippewa, the Chitimacha, the Chocheno, the Choctaw, the Cholon, the Chontal Maya, the Choynimni, the Chukchansi, the Chumash, the Clackamas, the Clallam, the Clatskanie, the Clatsop, the Cmique, the Coastal Cree, the Cochimi, the Cochiti, the Cocopa, the Coeur d'Alene, the Cofan, the Columbia, the Colville, the Comanche, the Comcaac, the Comox, the Conestoga, the Coos, the Copper River Athabaskan, the Coquille, the Cora, the Coso, the Costanoan, the Coushatta, the Cowichan, the Cowlitz, the Cree, the Creek, the Croatan, the Crow, the Cruzeo, the Cuna, the Cucupa, the Cupeo, the Cupik, the Dakelh, the Dakota, the Dakubetede, the Dawson, the Deg Xinag, the Delaware, the Dena'ina, the Dene, the Dene Suline, the Dene Tha, the Diegueno, the Dine, the Dogrib, the Dohema, the Dumna, the Dunne-za, the Eastern Inland Cree, the Eastern Pomo, the Eel River Athabascan, the Eenou, the Eskimo, the Esselen, the Etchemin, the Euchee, the Eudeve, the Excelen, the Eyak, the Fernandeno, the Flathead Salish, the Fox, the Gabrielino, the Gae, the Gaigwu, the Galibi, the Galice, the Garifuna, the Gashowu, the Gitxsan, the Gosiute, the Gros Ventre, the Guarani, the Guarijio, the Gulf Indians, the Gwich'in, the Haida, the Haisla, the Halkomelem, the Hn, the Hanis, the Hare, the Hatteras, the Haudenosaunee, the Havasupai, the Hawaiians, the Heiltsuk, the Heve, the Hiaki, the Hichiti, the Hidatsa, the Hocak, the Holikachuk, the Homalco, the Hoopa, the Hopi, the Hopland Pomo, the Hualapai, the Huelel, the Huichol, the Huichun, the Hupa, the Huron, the Illini, the Incas, the Ineseo, the Ingalik, the Innoko, the Innu, the Inuktitut, the Iowa-Oto, the Iroquois Confederacy, the Ishak, the Isleo, the Isleta, the Itza Maya, the Iviatim, the Iynu. the James Bay Cree, the Jemez, the Juaneno, the Juichun. the Kabinapek, the Kainai, the Kalapuya, the Kalina, the Kanenavish, the Kanien'kehaka, the Kalispel, the Kansa, the Karankawa, the Karkin, the Karok, the Kashaya, the Kaska, the Kaskaskia, the Kathlamet, the Kato, the Kaw, the Kenaitze, the Keres, the Kichai, the Kickapoo, the Kiliwa, the Kiowa, the Kiowa Apache, the Kitanemuk, the Kitsai, the Klahoose, the Klallam, the Klamath-Modoc, the Klatskanie, the Klatsop, the Klickitat, the Koasati, the Kolchan, the Konkow, the Konomihu, the Kootenai, the Koso, the Koyukon, the Kuitsh, the Kulanapo, the Kumeyaay, the Kuna, the Kupa, the Kusan, the Kuskokwim, the Kutchin, the Kwaiailk, the Kwakiutl, the Kwalhioqua, the Kwantlen, the Kwapa, the Kwinault, the Laguna, the Lakota, the Lakmiak, the Lassik, the Laurentian, the Lecesem, the Lenape, the Lillooet, the Lipan Apache, the Listiguj, the Lnuk, the Lokono, the Loucheux, the Loup, the Lower Chehalis, the Lower Coquille, the Lower Cowlitz, the Lower Tanana, the Lower Umpqua, the Luckiamute, the Luiseo, the Lumbee, the Lummi, the Lushootseed, the Lutuamian, the Macushi, the Mahican, the Maidu, the Maina, the Makah, the Makushi, the Maliseet, the Mandan, the Mapuche, the Maricopa, the Massachusett, the Massasoit, the Mattabesic Mattole, the Maumee, the Matlatzinca, the Mayan, the Mayo, the Mengwe, the Menominee, the Mescalero-Chiricahua, the Meskwaki, the Metis Creole, the Miami-Illinois, the Miccosukee, the Michif, the Micmac, the Migueleo, the Mikasuki, the Mi'kmaq, the Mingo, the Minqua, the Minsi, the Minto, the Miskito, the Missouria, the Miwok, the Mixe, the Mixtec, the Modoc, the Mohave, the Mohawk, the Mohegan, the Mohican, the Mojave, the Molale, the Monache, the Montagnais, the Montauk, the Moosehide, the Multnomah, the Munsee, the Muskogee, the Musqueam, the Mutsun, the Nabesna, the Nadot'en , the Nahane , the Nahuat, the Nahuatl, the Nakoda, the Nambe, the Nanticoke, the Nantucket, the Narragansett, the Naskapi, the Nass-Gitxsan, the Natchez, the Natick, the Naugutuck, the Navajo, the Nawat, the Nayhiyuwayin, the Nde, the Nee-me-poo, the Nehiyaw, the Netela, the New Blackfoot, the Newe, the Nez Perce, the Niantic, the Nicola, the Niitsipussin, the Nimiipuu, the Nipmuc, the Nisenan, the Nisga'a, the Nlaka'pamux, the Nomlaki, the Nooksack , the Nootka, the Nootsak, the Northeastern Pomo, the Northern Carrier Indians, the Northern Cheyenne, the Nottoway, the Nuu-chaa-nulth, the Nuxalk, the Obispeo, the Ocuilteco, the Odawa, the Ofo, the Ogahpah, the Ohlone, the Ojibwa, the Oji-Cree, the Okanagan, the Okwanuchu, the Old Blackfoot, the Omaha-Ponca, the Oneida, the Onondaga, the O'ob No'ok, the O'odham, the Opata, the Osage, the Otchipwe, the Otoe, the Ottawa , the Pai, the Paipai, the Paiute, the Palaihnihan, the Palewyami, the Palouse, the Pamlico, the Panamint, the Papago-Pima, the Pascua Yaqui, the Passamaquoddy, the Patuxet, the Patwin, the Paugussett, the Pawnee, the Peigan, the Pend D'Oreille, the Penobscot, the Pentlatch, the Peoria, the Pequot, the Picuris, the Piegan, the Pima, the Pima Bajo, the Pipil, the Pit River Indians, the Pojoaque, the Pomo, the Ponca, the Poospatuck, the Popoluca, the Potawatomi, the Powhatan, the Pueblo, the Puget Sound Salish tribe, the Purisimeo, the Putn, the Quapaw, the Quechan, the Quechua, the Quilcene, the Quileute, the Quinault, the Quinnipiac, the Quiripi, the Raramuri, the Restigouche, the Rumsen, the Runasimi, the Saanich, the Sac, the Sahaptin, the Salhulhtxw, the Salinan, the Salish, the Samish, the Sandia, the San Felipe, the San Ildefonso, the San Juan, the Sanpoil, the Santa Ana, the Santa Clara, the Santiam, the Santo Domingo, the Saponi, the Sarcee, the Sastean, the Satsop, the Savannah, the Sauk, the Saulteaux, the Schaghticoke, the Sechelt, the Secwepemc, the Sekani, the Selkirk, the Seminoles, the Seneca, the Seri, the Serrano, the Seshelt, the Severn Ojibwe, the Shanel, the Shasta, the Shawnee, the Shinnecock, the Shoshone, the Shuar, the Shuswap, the Siksika, the Siletz, the Similkameen, the Sinkiuse , the Sinkyone, the Sioux, the Siuslaw, the Skagit, the Skicin, the S'Klallam, the Skokomish, the Skraeling, the Skwamish, the Slavey, the Sliammon, the Sm'algyax, the Snichim, the Snohomish, the Songish, the Sooke, the Souriquois, the Southeastern Pomo, the Southern Paiute, the Spokane, the Squamish, the Stadaconan, the St'at'imcets, the Stockbridge, the Sto:lo, the Stoney, the Straits Salish, the Sugpiaq, the Suquamish, the Susquehannock, the Suwal, the Swampy Cree, the Swinomish, the Tabasco Chontal, the Tachi, the Taensa, the Tahltan, the Tagish, the Tahcully, the Taino, the Takelma, the Takla, the Taltushtuntude, the Tamyen, the Tanacross, the Tanaina, the Tanana, the Tano, the Taos, the Tarahumara, the Tataviam, the Tauira, the Teguime, the Tehachapi, the Ten'a, the Tenino, the Tepehuano, the Tequistlateco, the Tesuque, the Tetes-de-Boules, the Tewa, the Thompson, the Tigua, the Tillamook, the Timbisha, the Timucua, the Tinde, the Tinneh, the Tiwa, the Tjekan, the Tlahuica, the Tlatskanie, the Tlatsop, the Tlicho Dinne, the Tlingit, the Tohono O'odham, the Tolowa, the Tongva, the Tonkawa, the Towa, the Tsalagi, the Tsattine, the Tsekani, the Tsetsehestahese, the Tsetsaut, the Tsilhqot'in, the Tsimshian, the Tsitsistas, the Tsooke, the Tsoyaha, the Tsuu T'ina, the Tualatin, the Tubar, the Tubatulabal, the Takudh, the Tulalip, the Tumpisa, the Tunica, the Tupi, the Tuscarora, the Tutchone, the Tutelo, the Tututni, the Tuwa'duqutsid, the Twana, the Twatwa, the Uchi, the Ukiah, the Ukomnom, the Umatilla, the Unami, the Unangan, the Unkechaug, the Upper Chehalis, the Upper Chinook, the Upper Cowlitz, the Upper Tanana, the Upper Umpqua, the Ute, the Ventureo, the Virginian Algonkin , the Wailaki, the Wailatpu, the Walapai, the Walla Walla, the Wampano, the Wampanoag, the Wanapam, the Wanki, the Wappinger, the Wappo, the Warijio, the Warm Springs Indians, the Wasco-Wishram, the Washoe, the Wazhazhe, the Wea, the Wenatchi, the Wendat, the Weott, the Western Pomo, the Whilkut, the White Clay People, the Wichita, the Wikchamni, the Willapa, the Winnebago, the Wintu, the Wishram, the Witsuwit'en, the Wiyot, the Wolastoqewi, the Wyandot, the Yakama, the Yanesha, the Yaquina, the Yavapai, the Yawelmani, the Yaqui, the Yinka Dene, the Yneseo, the Yocot'an, the Yokaia, the Yokuts, the Yoncalla, the Yowlumni, the Ysleo, the Ysleta del Sur, the Yucatec Maya, the Yuchi, the Yuma, the Yupik, the Yurok, the Zapotec, the Zia, the Zimshian, the Zoque, and the Zuni.
But apart from that, you guys hardly conquered anyone. "Grabbing nations"? Hardly! Not many nations, anyway. A few hundred ... is that really significant? "Empire"? Not unless half a continent counts. It's not as though it's a big continent.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 11-07-2010 7:23 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 11-09-2010 8:47 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 111 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 68 of 144 (590394)
11-07-2010 11:41 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Dr Adequate
11-07-2010 6:45 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Maybe if everyone did live up to Christian principles then everything would be peachy. That's not the subject under discussion. The question is, was there a Golden Age? Is our modern secular culture actually worse than some imagined time when everyone loved Jesus? Did such a time even exist?
You have not even attempted a rational explanation of what you mean by Golden age. Please provide that and lets see if its even reasonable to approach
Yes and i have given you a time when such was the case.
And i will continue to ask the question, of what relevance is the question in the first place.
One needs to establish the relevance of such a query for it to have any meaning
Ah yes, the 1800s. Slavery, illiteracy, disenfranchisement of women, the Ku Klux Klan and the Civil War.
The good old days.
Would you actually rather live then than now? If not, then those were not the good old days.
Now you switch gears. I thought we were discussing a time when people honored the Christian principles more than others and when they were used as a rule of the land
Im sure at this point you can begin to see why such a query as Theos is utter nonsense
Anybody can make a list of those things described above in any age.
When I do answer your question you change directions and avoid the obvious point
Dawn Bertot
Maybe you could answer that this time.
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-07-2010 6:45 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-07-2010 11:51 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 313 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 69 of 144 (590395)
11-07-2010 11:51 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 11:41 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
You have not even attempted a rational explanation of what you mean by Golden age.
It's not my claim.
If Buz went around claiming that he had a pet unicorn it wouldn't be up to me to say what he meant by "unicorn".
Now you switch gears. I thought we were discussing a time when people honored the Christian principles more than others and when they were used as a rule of the land
Im sure at this point you can begin to see why such a query as Theos is utter nonsense
Anybody can make a list of those things described above in any age.
When I do answer your question you change directions and avoid the obvious point
Presumably when you wrote this gibberish you thought that it meant something.
Please do tell everyone --- what is the "obvious point"? And in what sense is it "obvious"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:41 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:56 PM Dr Adequate has replied
 Message 72 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-08-2010 12:01 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 111 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 70 of 144 (590396)
11-07-2010 11:53 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by Theodoric
11-07-2010 8:21 PM


Re: Is that your answer?
Did you even read the OP?
Do you mean this statement from the OP?
From OP
Can Buz and others tell us when the golden age of biblical principles was. When did the calamitous decline start?
My premise is there never was such an age. I and others will attempt to refute there was such an age if Buz and other fundies argue there was.
Yes I read it, so what. My point is that because you do not understand the nature or purpose of the bible, your question makes absolutley no sense
Or at best it is irrational unless you show why such a query is relevant
Can you show why it is relevant?
Give it a shot
Dawn Bertot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Theodoric, posted 11-07-2010 8:21 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Theodoric, posted 11-08-2010 12:46 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 111 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 71 of 144 (590397)
11-07-2010 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Dr Adequate
11-07-2010 11:51 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Presumably when you wrote this gibberish you thought that it meant something.
Please do tell everyone --- what is the "obvious point"? And in what sense is it "obvious"?
The obvious point is that the query makes no sense unless he can show relevance. I can repeat that again if yopu dont understand it
Do you understand it?
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-07-2010 11:51 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-08-2010 12:22 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 111 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 72 of 144 (590398)
11-08-2010 12:01 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by Dr Adequate
11-07-2010 11:51 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
If Buz went around claiming that he had a pet unicorn it wouldn't be up to me to say what he meant by "unicorn".
Since Buz has not disagreed with my conclusions of Golden age, then maybe you could address my conclusions concerning that matter
You asked me for a answer I gave you one. Surprise surprise, you disagreed. What next
Dawn Bertot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-07-2010 11:51 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 313 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 73 of 144 (590400)
11-08-2010 12:22 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 11:56 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
The obvious point is that the query makes no sense unless he can show relevance. I can repeat that again if yopu dont understand it
Do you understand it?
No. As usual, you have posted incomprehensible gibberish.
I believe that you've said that English isn't your first language, but that's not your main problem. Your real problem is that the stuff you say doesn't make any darn sense --- not just in the sense that it's wrong (which it often is) but that it's meaningless. When you manage to say something so meaningful as to be actually wrong, that's you having a good day.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:56 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-08-2010 11:16 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9199
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 74 of 144 (590402)
11-08-2010 12:46 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 11:53 PM


Re: Is that your answer?
Yes I read it, so what. My point is that because you do not understand the nature or purpose of the bible, your question makes absolutley no sense
If you think it is not relevant then don't post to the thread. I have asked you very nicely to not attempt to lead this thread off topic.
This is the topic.
Can Buz and others tell us when the golden age of biblical principles was. When did the calamitous decline start?
This is Buz's claim not mine. If you do not support his claim there was some sort of golden age then you should not be posting to this thread. You can just say there was no such period and leave it at that.
Or at best it is irrational unless you show why such a query is relevant
Can you show why it is relevant?
That you think it is irrational is of no concern to me. I do not have to prove any sort of relevance to you.
Please stop trying to distract this thread. I have asked nicely. Next time I will request admin help.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:53 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-08-2010 11:24 AM Theodoric has not replied
 Message 99 by Larni, posted 11-09-2010 7:16 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 111 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 75 of 144 (590466)
11-08-2010 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Dr Adequate
11-08-2010 12:22 AM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
No. As usual, you have posted incomprehensible gibberish.
Your audience is watching DA, just answer the questions. Your good at demanding that others answer questions, dont let your audience down DA
Your continual evasion by insult looks really bad DA
I believe that you've said that English isn't your first language, but that's not your main problem. Your real problem is that the stuff you say doesn't make any darn sense --- not just in the sense that it's wrong (which it often is) but that it's meaningless. When you manage to say something so meaningful as to be actually wrong, that's you having a good day.
The typical response by someone that does not know how to debate is ridicule.
You accuse Buzz and myself of not being able to provide a time when there was a golden age
We have provided such a time and you disagreed with it. Big surprise
So I asked you to give your definition of Golden age and your response was you did not know, it was Buzz's claim
Therefore, (this is a logical conclusion DA, if you dont recognize it) if you are not aware of or cannot give a rational definition of or an explanation of what constitutes a golden age,
How will you claim that such has not taken place, if you do not even know what it (golden age is) constitutes
You do understand that a part of debating is explanation of terms correct, especially when you are suggesting such did not take place, correct
Come on DA give us a rational way to proceed, give us an explanation of Golden age, that which you say did not happen
You do understand alittle about debate dont you? Im beginning to think you dont
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-08-2010 12:22 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-08-2010 11:24 AM Dawn Bertot has replied
 Message 82 by nwr, posted 11-08-2010 12:44 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024