A highly qualified and respected scientist makes the point that there is an agenda in play, and a lack of scientific objectivity in the institution that is charged with researching the issue.
Well, sure. That's the accusation he's making.
What's the
proof he presents? None at all. he just says "ClimateGate" like it settles the issue.
There doesn't seem to be any thought given that just maybe the charges he has made should at least be investigated.
But they were investigated. He even admits they were investigated. The individuals involved in "ClimateGate" were investigated
eight times, with not a single investigation lending any credence whatsoever to the accusations.
The individual who violated the privacy of scientists, as well as the law, by hacking into a private email server and anonymously releasing the contents has never been identified or investigated.