GDR writes:A highly qualified and respected scientist makes the point that there is an agenda in play, and a lack of scientific objectivity in the institution that is charged with researching the issue.
He makes an assertion. As far as I can tell, his only hint at supporting evidence is his mention of "Climate Gate". One must presume that he is quite unaware that those accused in Climate Gate have been completely exonerated.
GDR writes:What do we see on this forum. This highly respected scientist is called a fool, a denialist.
He is making false assertions, apparently based on bogus evidence that is circulating on denialist web sites.
GDR writes:There doesn't seem to be any thought given that just maybe the charges he has made should at least be investigated.
The "Climate Gate" charges have been very thoroughly investigated, and have been debunked.