Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Is an Intelligent Designer Necessary?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is an Intelligent Designer Necessary?
John Paul
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 52 of 89 (73215)
12-15-2003 11:38 PM 		Reply to: Message 3 by Darwin's Terrier
11-26-2003 7:26 AM

No one said that the design had to be or had to remain perfect. What we now observe as suboptimal is the result of time & mutations.
​
We don't need to identify the designer in order to in fer one. All we need is evidence. The evidence for a designer exists. Newton saw it, as did Kepler. Aristotle & Socrates saw it, as did Galileo. Today Behe & Dembski see it and discuss it.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Darwin's Terrier, posted 11-26-2003 7:26 AM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 12-16-2003 4:11 AM John Paul has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024