Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is an Intelligent Designer Necessary?
Peter
Member (Idle past 1509 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 2 of 89 (69348)
11-26-2003 5:09 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Russell E. Rierson
11-25-2003 10:20 PM


...is that what the Higgs field/particle stuff is about?
As to showing that an 'intelligent designer' is not
necessary, I think that the often mentioned evolutionary
design algorithms show that.
That random changes + selection can produce useful designs,
even better designs than people can, has been shown.
That alone shows that an 'intelligent designer' is not
necessary (not that there isn't one, but that things can
look 'designed', can BE 'designed' without intelligent
designer in the equation).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Russell E. Rierson, posted 11-25-2003 10:20 PM Russell E. Rierson has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024