Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 53 (9179 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Post Volume: Total: 918,055 Year: 5,312/9,624 Month: 337/323 Week: 181/160 Day: 17/38 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3736 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 104 of 683 (593924)
11-30-2010 12:43 PM


So the best place to put this is here?
Hi Bolder-dash,
Let me try to explain more clearly this time.
This is the only thread where one can raise issues concerning discussion. If you are experiencing problems in a discussion, then this is the place to bring it to the attention of moderators.
But moderation itself is not a topic for discussion. If you wish to discuss your issues with the style of moderation here at EvC Forum then you will have to discuss them at some other bulletin board.
--Admin
Edited by Admin, : Hide content, comments coming...
Edited by Admin, : Add comments.

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3736 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 159 of 683 (602840)
02-01-2011 4:02 AM


percy's late of action
What I know is that you seem to have a blind spot for your own snark, and that despite the many times I have advised you to refrain from responding in kind so that a moderator can take action that you never do that.
If you focus on the topic and follow the Forum Guidelines then the moderators will be on your side. Moderators don't care about the position, they care about whether a participant is contributing or hindering discussion, and the Forum Guidelines are our guide in this respect. One of our moderators, slevesque, is a creationist. I've CC'd him. The relevant message is Message 711, you'll have to click on "peek" to see the content, the prior message is Message 703.
-- Percy
EvC Forum Director
Percy, I gave you a list of more than 10 posts in one thread alone, including these gems, of which you have taken absolutely no action:
Dr. A to
post:
"The fact that someone more knowledgeable than you finds your gibberish downright embarrassing to read ... supports your position?
Perhaps you could explain why. Or perhaps you could post more gibberish. Only time will tell, although I believe that I can guess. "
and this:
"You are, of course, wrong. (that was his entire post!)
and this:
"So you are unable or unwilling to produce any argument that might even appear to support your gibberish.
Yeah, well, you are a creationist. "
and
"The prediction that any attempt to defend creationism will be ignorant, stupid, dishonest, or all three simultaneously is once again confirmed. " (Again his entire post! This is contributing to the discussion????)
and finally this:
"No, apparently there is a third option. You could gibber out dishonest equivocations on the word "random", and we could laugh at you.
You silly little man. " (once again, this is all he had to add to the forum! unbelievable!)
Cavediver wrote:
"I'm sorry, but even if he does explain himself, Shapiro is still an idiot for using the term "non-random" in this context. But then, BD has made it quite clear that he only wants to use idiot-speak, so probably best if you don't mention big words like "distribution" and "probability" as they will only upset him.
Theodoric wrote:
"To Shadow, Bolder and their ilk it is not important want Shapiro meant. What matters is how the can manipulate the language of what he said to meet their needs. Honesty and integrity means nothing."
Now are you telling me that all of these posts are an acceptable standard to use of this forum? Are they content worthy, on topic and respectful?
Because you sure as heck have not taken any action whatsoever for these posts, so one can only assume that this is acceptable?
And then you send a private message to me, saying that the problem is all mine?
So give a straight answer this time instead of always trying to direct the blame to me. Are these other posts acceptable or not? YES or NO?
Did you take any action at all regarding any of these posts? So I can use their standard in the future since you have not repudiated these posts?
Claiming your moderation is applied equally doesn't make it so Percy. Does it get any more obvious than this?
Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.
Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by Admin, posted 02-01-2011 8:53 AM Bolder-dash has not replied
 Message 164 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-10-2011 7:27 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3736 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


(1)
Message 395 of 683 (634398)
09-21-2011 9:33 AM


percy completely out of line.
Someone needs to remind him that this is supposed to be a debate site. If someone uses the defense, as WK did in the "Wright et al. on the Process of Mutation" that the "modern synthesis" takes all of the Shapiros new found discoveries into account, he should be expected to explain that. It is completely ON TOPIC and appropriate to address his point that he has not made a clear explanation of what this means.
Since Percy has shown over and over again that he is completely incapable of moderating such discussions fairly, and since he simply wants to hold a grudge because I disagree with his point of view, shouldn't a more fair moderator be used to decide what is and isn't on topic? Why did you bring in a so called 'creationist" moderator in Chuck77 if Percy is still going to continue to just barricade the doors for any discussions that challenge the prevailing point of view on EVC?
How can anyone be expected to have a discussion about evolution, if pro-evolutionists are allowed to throw out any term they want, without the responsibility of defining those terms. One side is allowed to say anything they want, but the other side can never challenge it.
As soon as I start a new topic to discuss the issue, Percy will also decide what he thinks can be discussed in that topic as well, and it becomes a never ending game of Percy trying to control who is winning any debate. If Dr. A cries that something is off topic because it is too difficult to answer, Percy will come running with his diapers to help him. Its disgusting.
Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 396 by Son, posted 09-21-2011 10:27 AM Bolder-dash has replied
 Message 399 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-21-2011 11:43 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3736 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 397 of 683 (634409)
09-21-2011 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 396 by Son
09-21-2011 10:27 AM


Re: percy completely out of line.
Actually, I was going to post a link, but then I thought Percy would probably suspend me claiming that my link was off topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 396 by Son, posted 09-21-2011 10:27 AM Son has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 398 by Admin, posted 09-21-2011 11:13 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3736 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 580 of 683 (666365)
06-26-2012 1:07 PM


Pandas with rabies
If this doesn't merit a suspension, then virtually nothing does:
javascript:void(0)
EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Big Bang and Cosmology ⇒ Creation cosmology and the Big Bang
Message 227 of 232 (666354)
06-26-2012 11:53 PM

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3736 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 581 of 683 (666385)
06-26-2012 2:29 PM


So an evolutionist who posts for the sole purpose of calling someone a babbling idiot gets one a 24 hour suspension, but a creationist supposedly being off topic on a science post gets a one month, or else a permanent ban from posting in certain topics?
Any wonder where so few creationists bother here?

Replies to this message:
 Message 582 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-26-2012 2:32 PM Bolder-dash has not replied
 Message 583 by AdminModulous, posted 06-26-2012 3:13 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

Bolder-dash
Member (Idle past 3736 days)
Posts: 983
From: China
Joined: 11-14-2009


Message 627 of 683 (668771)
07-24-2012 11:01 AM


Transparency?
Admin,
I see a message that I can't respond to a biological forum post. At least when you have blackballed me from commenting in forums, you should make it a public record and explain why, don't you think?
I means since you always brag about how fair it is here.

Replies to this message:
 Message 628 by Panda, posted 07-24-2012 12:14 PM Bolder-dash has not replied
 Message 629 by Admin, posted 07-24-2012 1:01 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024