Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9178 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,094 Year: 5,351/9,624 Month: 376/323 Week: 16/204 Day: 16/21 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3565 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 262 of 683 (615023)
05-09-2011 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 259 by Admin
04-29-2011 1:49 PM


Misunderstanding - Need a Ref
I feel that Crashfrog has a tendency to not accept correction when he has misunderstood an opponents point. This usually leads to a discussion to try and clear up the misunderstanding and not the topic. Once the discussion has reached the frustration level, it is difficult and time consuming for moderators to wade through the posts and attempt to find the problem.
Here is a chance to see the problem before it snowballs.
Crashfrog entered the discussion at Message 26 and there are only five posts so far.
I let him know in Message 31 that he was incorrect, which he did not accept and I tried in Message 40 to clarify it further. Now he's at the point of claiming I'm being deceitful.
Could a moderator please review the posts and see if I have made the claims he states.
Thanks
PurpleDawn
Edited by Admin, : Fix message link.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Admin, posted 04-29-2011 1:49 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 263 by crashfrog, posted 05-09-2011 6:11 PM purpledawn has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3565 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


(1)
Message 265 of 683 (615076)
05-10-2011 2:45 AM
Reply to: Message 264 by PaulK
05-10-2011 1:40 AM


Re: Misunderstanding - Need a Ref
quote:
In my view you have clearly misunderstood Purpledawn. ...
In fact Purpledawn seems to be saying saying that your "narrow" way to construe it was the "appropriate" way to construe it. ...
All Purpledawn was agreeing with was your description of "worshipping Mammon" - with the additional claim that it argued AGAINST your position.
Your summary is correct. Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by PaulK, posted 05-10-2011 1:40 AM PaulK has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3565 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


(1)
Message 480 of 683 (652444)
02-13-2012 6:39 PM


Panda Cries Deceipt
Panda comes in at Message 55
Cries deceit at Message 75 and Message 83
That's pretty much my standard argument concerning omnipotence since I've been a member.
Killed the discussion. Need a call on whether the cry is justified.
Thanks
Edited by purpledawn, : No reason given.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024