peer reviewed-int. design?

RAZD:
Richard Dawkins covers eye design in his book "The Blind Watchmaker" - see chapter 4 (p77 in paperback edition)John Paul:
And Mike Behe trashes his clumsiness in the book Darwin's Black Box. IOW Dawkins is guilty, as Behe states, of gross anatomy. He uses generalizations void of detail.

scallops

RAZD:
1) behe is not credible, as has been shown on many occasions.John Paul:
By whom?RAZD:
(2) this is just a statement on your part. details some of the specifics please. perhaps you can explain what you mean by "gross anatomy" -- parts of the body that you find gross?John Paul:
The way you talked about Behe I had figured you read his stuff, my bad. Gross anatomy means that the details are missing. IOW you can say such-n-such evolved but you haven't the evidence to substantiate that claim.What you or any other evolutionist can show is that random mutations culled by NS led to the development of any vision system. without that evidence all you have is a theory of credulity. IOW all you have is opinion.