Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Herbal supplements in US commonly have traces of contaminants
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 102 (578980)
09-03-2010 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Apothecus
09-02-2010 2:00 PM


Re: Regulating Weeds.
Apothecus writes:
I know some of you don't think too highly about Rx meds due to dangers, side effects, etc, but at least these dangers are studied, tested, and documented (if not before hand, then after as anecdotal evidence becomes available). With naturopathic remedies, there is often no independent testing, and even anecdotal evidence tends to get hand-waved away.
First, as I understand them, naturopatic remedies are not an herbal perse and a relative minimal aspect of alternatives.
What good is the testing of pharms when every horror all the way to death is allowed, whereas, one or two deaths are attributed to comphrey when some dummie or two overdosed on the root? The pharms are in the pocket of the FDA and the polititions. It's more about $$ and power than safety.
Regulation only makes more $$ for the pharms and hassle for folks like me an my family who've never use expensive docs and who don't burden the taxpayers with medicare and gubm't paid healthcare. We know what herbals and suppliments to apply to which ailment. We know what to eat for ultimate health. Still at 75, Buzgirl and I haven't seen a doc in about 40 years, her for childbirth and me once when pharms almost did me in.
Apothecus writes:
In the pharmacy, we're just now able to obtain fairly adequate references as to dosing, safety, and efficacy of (some of) these products, and even then it's sketchy at best. Some products have absolutely nothing to describe them save for what they've historically been used for. Patients then ask if they can take Blackwortyeastian with their Wellbutrin, and all I can do is ... *shrug*.
Most naturals have disclaimer warnings on them with advice to check doc and not to take with pharms etc. Nearly all such remedies advocated in the media also include warnings to check doc first if on other meds etc. That's by law that they can't claim them as cures.
Bottom line is that RARE, RARE, RARELY do we hear of a serious illness, side effect or death from the naturals, when, in fact hundreds of thousands die (I SAY DIE) from the pharms yearly. (I SAY YEARLY.), not to mention the millions who have heart attacks and all kinds of serious side effects from the PRESCRIBED drugs.
Why should an herbal pill, having the ingredients of a weed or vegie which you can pick in the field need some bureaucratic oversight costing taxpayers millions for the bureaucracy and putting most of the naturals makers and businesses out of business because the big pharms are the only ones who can afford the added expense of producing and marketing?
NOT TO MENTION, HAVE WE LOST ALL SENSE OF THE VALUE OF FREEDOM? FREEDOM ENTAILS AN ELEMENT OF RISK. A CAGED UP BIRD IS SAFE BUT NOT FREE. A FREE BIRD MAY NOT BE AS SAFE BUT A HAPPIER BIRD. ALL WE NEED IS A BATCH MORE OF LAWS TO FURTHER ENSLAVE OURSELVES TO TOTALITARIAN BIG GOVERNMENT.
THE FDA ALREADY HAS THE POWER TO REGUATE HERBALS WHICH THEY DEEM TO POSE A RISK. THAT'S WHY THEY BANNED COMFREY. WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER LAW, THROWING OUT THE BABY WITH WHAT THEY CONSIDER BATHWATER.
With the naturals forced out of business and millions more out of work, who will be left as an alternative to big gubm't sanctioned dangerous pharms? We all loose, sheeples for the slaughter.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Apothecus, posted 09-02-2010 2:00 PM Apothecus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Apothecus, posted 09-08-2010 11:23 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 102 (578983)
09-03-2010 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by nator
09-03-2010 8:00 AM


returninator writes:
Currently, herbal supplements are not regulated even as well as food is.
What makes you think so? The reason you don't hear about contaminated or side effects from herbals is because the side effects of herbals are GOOD, that they are, by law required to have expiration dates and that they are not generally prone to spoilage etc.
returninator writes:
Actually, the FDA has been wanting to regulate herbal supplements for years and years, and it is the conservatives in congress who have consistently and repeatedly weakened most regulatory bodies like the FDA, the EPA, etc. I don't blame Big Business; they are doing what they are supposed to be doing. I blame our elected officials for gutting funding and power to the regulatory agencies.
It's not only the conservatives. It's the sensible majority that has some regard for freedom and enough common sense to know how relatively little the risk is. How big and oppressive do you want big gubm't to get? How about gubm't mandated breathometers to placate the enviroweenies?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by nator, posted 09-03-2010 8:00 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by nator, posted 09-03-2010 5:36 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 102 (579217)
09-03-2010 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Dogmafood
09-03-2010 9:29 AM


Re: Regulate Pharms, Not Herbals
Dogmafood writes:
Annual Causes of Death in the United States
Tobacco 435,000
Poor Diet and Physical Inactivity 365,000
Alcohol 85,000
Microbial Agents 75,000
Toxic Agents 55,000
Motor Vehicle Crashes 26,347
Adverse Reactions to Prescription Drugs 32,000
Suicide 30,622
Incidents Involving Firearms 29,000
Homicide 20,308
Sexual Behaviors 20,000
All Illicit Drug Use, Direct and Indirect 17,000
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Such As Aspirin 7,600
Marijuana 0
You missed a biggie, Dogmafood. Add to your list over 700,000 annulal medical malpractice deaths, 150,000 to 200,000 being from prescribed drugs. (Where did you get your so low figure on prescribed drugs? I've seen figures as high as 350,000 but never anywhere near your low figure)
Mmm, about your marijuana zero. How about a percentage of suicide deaths attributed to drug use. How about the percentage of auto accidents attributed to wild druggie motorists. Ditto for drug related homicides. Every sizeable city has nearly daily drug homicides). Ditto for firearms.
All of the above can't directly be attributed to marijuana, but being maijuana is usually where drug addiction begins, a large percentage can be either directly or indirectly attributed to marijuana.
Bottom line: Hundreds of thousands can be either directly or indirectly attributed to marijuana usage.
That is not to say that there aren't some beneficial aspects of the drug, but the dangers of it give reason to avoid it.
As a matter of fact, many of the deaths in your list other than the prescription drugs should be subtracted from other causes on the list such as suicides, motor accidents, firearms, heart attacks, cancer, liver diseases, anurisms, stroke, insanity, etc AND ADDED TO THE PRESCRIBED PHARMACUTAL DEATHS
In effect the pharms are way under-regulated. What is needed is to rein in the deadly pharms and promote the herbals. What is good for the sheeple is bass akwards, so far as govmn't regulation and scrutiny goes.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Dogmafood, posted 09-03-2010 9:29 AM Dogmafood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Dogmafood, posted 09-03-2010 9:59 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 64 by nator, posted 09-04-2010 7:35 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 102 (579224)
09-03-2010 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Omnivorous
09-03-2010 12:36 PM


Re: One man's herb
omnivorous writes:
But herbal materials packaged as medicine and sold to the public as medicine shoud be subject to strict regulation and testing; outlandish, undocumented claims should be forbidden; materials contaminated with prescription drugs or heavy metals should lead to criminal prosecutions.
First off, herbals are not packaged and sold as medicine. They are sold as natural food suppliments; big, big difference.
Now, Omni, let us reason together on this nutty regulation nonsense you sheeple are advocating. Literally millions have died in wars, fought either for defending freedom, retrieving lost freedoms and as victims of oppressive big bloody guvm'ts.
Now, what makes more sense? Figuring on a dozen or two deaths from herbals over the decades or law by law, squandering away our freedoms as ongoing wars for freedom rage on? Why should thousands be dying in hot desert wars as home sheeple sit in comfy air conditioned homes typing nonsense that we have? Hmm?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Omnivorous, posted 09-03-2010 12:36 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by crashfrog, posted 09-03-2010 8:59 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 46 by bluescat48, posted 09-03-2010 9:24 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 62 by Omnivorous, posted 09-04-2010 5:13 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 65 by nator, posted 09-04-2010 7:37 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 102 (579251)
09-03-2010 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by crashfrog
09-03-2010 8:59 PM


Re: One man's herb
crashfrog writes:
........contaiminated herbs have to poison somebody, or the fascists win!
I take it that you're trying to label folks who want less guvm't control of the herbals fascists. If my tired ole brain has deciphered the wordage of your message wrong or if you can explain, sensibly, why folks who think like me are fascist I'll ramp up the 1 rating I gave your message up some.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by crashfrog, posted 09-03-2010 8:59 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by crashfrog, posted 09-04-2010 12:03 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 102 (579253)
09-03-2010 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Dogmafood
09-03-2010 9:59 PM


Re: Regulate Pharms, Not Herbals
Dogmafood writes:
My point was that alot of people die from regulated drugs. Regulations dont protect you as much as information does.
I got your ultimate point that you want marijuana deregulated, but you didn't answer my question. Where did you come up with your figure on the pharms deaths annually?
Dogmafood writes:
Bottom line: Hundreds of thousands can be either directly or indirectly attributed to marijuana usage.
Thats probably another thread but the regulation of mj has killed alot more people than the plant itself.
How so, especially figuring in the indirect danger of controlled illicit drugs.
Dogmafood writes:
Buzsaw writes:
What is good for the sheeple is bass akwards, so far as govmn't regulation and scrutiny goes.
I dont know that that is fair but you can protect yourself against it with information.
How can you protect yourself if you can't buy and sell freely the safe naturals because the producers are regulated out of business?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Dogmafood, posted 09-03-2010 9:59 PM Dogmafood has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 10:38 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 53 by DrJones*, posted 09-03-2010 11:13 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 102 (579259)
09-03-2010 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by bluescat48
09-03-2010 9:24 PM


Re: One man's herb
bluescat48 writes:
Sthen how do I know if the herbal supplement will or will not interact with my hydrochlorothiazide (blood thinner) or my metoprolol tartrate (High Blood pressure medicine).
On the side of the bottle of the seonsd medicine listed it states
Metoprolol label writes:
WARNING: take with or immediately after food.
It is very important that you take or use this exactly as directed. Do not skip doses or discontinue unless directed by your doctor.
May cause dizziness
may cause drowsiness. Alcohol may intensify this effect. Use care when operating a car or dangerous machines.
Some non-prescription drugs may aggravate your condition. Read all labels carefully. If a warning appears, check with your doctor
A similar but different warning is on the other.
Now what instructions are on the herbals?
As an example, I take Hawthorn berry capsules twice a day for a healthy heart. (My pulse ranges from 48 bpm to 55 bpm, likely due to being a long distance track runner when young.)
A warning on it reads as follows:
WARNING: Consult your healthcare provider before use if you are pregnant, nursing or taking prescription medication, especially medication prescribed for heart/cardiovascular conditions.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by bluescat48, posted 09-03-2010 9:24 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by bluescat48, posted 09-04-2010 1:28 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 102 (579265)
09-03-2010 11:15 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by jar
09-03-2010 10:38 PM


Re: Regulate Pharms, Not Herbals
jar writes:
Where is there any evidence that producers would be regulated out of business?
I suggest a reading of the whole page from which the following segment was copied.
This move by the FDA is designed to once and for all destroy the 1994 DSHEA law that has made supplements "legal" while eliminating nutritional supplements and natural medicine from the United States, ensuring monopoly profits and control by drug companies and the FDA. It is the latest action item by the FDA / Big Pharma conspiracy that will not stop until health freedom has been abolished, drug companies rule the nation, and every citizen is diagnosed with a fictitious disease and drugged up on monopoly-priced pharmaceuticals.
FDA "experts" will decide what's a drug or medical device Under these proposed guidelines, FDA "experts" (the same corrupt officials who reapproved Vioxx after it killed over 50,000 Americans) will decide whether herbs, supplements, vitamins or simple devices like massage stones are to be regulated as drugs and medical devices. If the FDA experts, in their infinite wisdom, decide that these things are to be reclassified, they will essentially be outlawed, stripped from the shelves, and regulated out of existence. Anyone who dares to manufacture, promote or sell such products may be branded a criminal and rounded up by armed FDA agents who have a well established history of suppressing natural medicine
(Color emphasis mine)

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 10:38 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by jar, posted 09-03-2010 11:25 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 102 (579268)
09-03-2010 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by DrJones*
09-03-2010 11:13 PM


Re: Regulate Pharms, Not Herbals
Dr Jones writes:
How do you know your naturals are safe without regulations governing their production and use?
Me? Like I say, after taking likely a ton or so over the decades, the only side effects have been good, enhancing whole body health. Why should I worry about safety when there's essentially no threat, being I take no pharms; not even aspirin.
What I worry about now is the likely loss of freedom and loss of sources to buy the products. Buzgirl and I can cure a ourselves and our pet dog of ailments combining herbals, vits, and diet etc. We can also prevent ailments with them. We have avoided docs and vets totally over the decades, but, of course, the guvm't don't allow the bottles to be labeled possible cures. That's ok, but essentially outlawing what we need; not ok.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by DrJones*, posted 09-03-2010 11:13 PM DrJones* has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by DrJones*, posted 09-03-2010 11:40 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 102 (579272)
09-03-2010 11:42 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by nator
09-03-2010 5:36 PM


returinator writes:
I linked to an article about herbs for sale in US being commonly contaminated with pesticides and heavy metals.
We're hearing about contaminated herbs, Buz.
Can you document what percentage have heavy metals and pesticides? Most of the comanies we buy from use organically grown ingredients. The synthetics likely are more prone to have traces of contaminants.
But how many people are getting seriously ill or dying from even the ones with traces of contaminants? Likely few or none. Many of the unregulated foods on grocery shelves have even more of these contaminants than the herbals. Compare that to the dangerous poisonous prescribed pharms record and go figure.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by nator, posted 09-03-2010 5:36 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by nator, posted 09-04-2010 7:59 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 69 by jar, posted 09-04-2010 10:02 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 102 (579435)
09-04-2010 4:26 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by nator
09-04-2010 7:37 AM


Re: One man's herb
nator writes:
buzsaw writes:
First off, herbals are not packaged and sold as medicine.
Why not, when they are used as medicine?
The primary usage of herbals is preventative food suppliments. They, just like food, can be used, in the broad sense of the term, medicinally but their most common and intended usage is as food suppliments. These food suppliments include such herbs as beets, garlic, wheat grass, cilantro, parsely, flax, rose hips, celery, hot pepper, various berries, including rasberry, cherry, etc.
nator writes:
They certainly aren't used because they are delicious additions to your favorite recipe.
It is irrevelant as to whether they are tasty. What is revelant to this topic is their safety, so far as causing serious enough threat to life and health.
nator writes:
They aren't marketed as food products. The language on the packages talk about things like reproductive organs, bladders, hearts, and digestive systems, and what effects the contents of the box has on the body.
Nator, obviously you don't know what you're talking about. None of the many bottles of herbals, minerals and other food suppliments I have mention any of the things you are alleging. I just went to the kitchen and read what we have there. All of the information on the labels is instructions as to how many are recommended for usage, who, if any should not be taken, warnings about children access, and ingredients.
Hawthorne is widely known as beneficial to the heart organ but nothing about the heart is mentioned on the bottle. The companies simply produce and market the products. It's up to the healthcare provider or purchaser to pick and choose what they want for whatever purpose, whether preventative or medicinal.
Likely I would have not ordered Hawthorne had I not had information about some of it's benefits. In most cases any given herb has a wholistic value, in that many aspects of the overall health of the whole body are benefited by the herb, vitamine or mineral, just like, generally a diet including raw vegies, nuts and fruits are beneficial to the whole body, wholistically.
nator writes:
Oh, so there is data available on adverse reactions experienced by people taking herbal drugs? Tell me, in which states are Naturopaths, herbalists, health food store clerks, and other people who prescribe herbal drugs to their patients required by the government to report adverse reactions?
Just like foods such as eggs and meat, they are all already regulated by the FDA. When significant, (I say significant) complaints come known they are suppose to act. compared to foods in general and especially comparable to pharms, no way has there been any significant complaint about the herbals. The most significant feedback from them are the good side effects to the whole body health that they bring.
Nator, bottom line is that it nonsensical to put a whole beneficial industry, employing millions out of business; an industry, like the food industry, already FDA regulated by classifying them as prescription drugs when in fact they are not drugs and they pose no significant health risk to life and health.
nator writes:
MDs and hospitals are required, by law, to report these incidents, which is why we have such a lot of information about adverse drug reactions.
Apples and oranges. LOL. When health issues significant for action by the FDA arise, be it in the food industry or any other reason, it becomes quickly known and the FDA goes into action. It took only one comfry death to a dummie who took too much root to get it outlawed, when in fact multiple deaths are allowable by many pharms still on the market. Follow the money for the answer to that and why the pharms supported Obama-care and this oppressive bill being debated here.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by nator, posted 09-04-2010 7:37 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by nator, posted 09-05-2010 9:03 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 102 (579436)
09-04-2010 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by jar
09-04-2010 10:02 AM


jar writes:
How do you know?
Why?
We buy from time tested reputable herbal producers and we know they help us keep healthy. Other than that, who cares. It's not revelant to this debate so far as serious health risk goes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by jar, posted 09-04-2010 10:02 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by jar, posted 09-04-2010 4:40 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied
 Message 91 by nator, posted 09-05-2010 9:03 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 102 (579441)
09-04-2010 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by bluescat48
09-04-2010 1:28 AM


Re: One man's herb
bluescat48 writes:
So I could not take your herbal substance. Your manufacturer is obviously doing the correct thing without regulation, but that does not mean that all do. What if I were to buy it from a manufacturer who is not so ethical and puts no cardio/vascular warning. Using it could kill me, and is most likely the cause of a number of drug related deaths. If all manufacturers placed warnings of interaction on their products, there would be no need for regulations, only some don't.
Nearly all companies are aware of the liability risk in any given business and they know what labeling info is necessary to protect themselves relative to warnings and info. It is in their best interest to label warnings.
There is a far greater health and life risk in food diet, especially fat foods, junk foods candies, icecream pop, etc than in the herbals, yet nobody is clamoring for additional regulation of the food industry.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by bluescat48, posted 09-04-2010 1:28 AM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Jon, posted 09-04-2010 7:08 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 79 of 102 (579501)
09-04-2010 10:43 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Jon
09-04-2010 7:08 PM


Re: One man's herb
Jon writes:
I believe all of these things should be regulated, very heavily.
Where does regulation end and freedom begin, in your thinking? How about if guvm't comes on into your garage, basement, yard, kitchen, living room and bedroom and regulate you into total safety?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Jon, posted 09-04-2010 7:08 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by jar, posted 09-04-2010 10:48 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 95 by Jon, posted 09-05-2010 3:47 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 82 of 102 (579515)
09-04-2010 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by Omnivorous
09-04-2010 5:13 AM


Re: One man's herb
Omnivorous writes:
If your herbals have any effect, good or bad, it's because they contain chemicals: chemicals active in the human body are called drugs.
Nonsense! Most of our herbals have no chemicals in them. Many foods and drinks contain chemicals. What's the difference. They, like most nutritional herbals are not considered drugs.
Online Dictionary definition of chemical:
1. Of or relating to chemistry.
2. Of or relating to the properties or actions of chemicals.
n.
1. A substance with a distinct molecular composition that is produced by or used in a chemical process.
2. A drug, especially an illicit or addictive one.
Many foods and drinks have chemicals in them.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Omnivorous, posted 09-04-2010 5:13 AM Omnivorous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by jar, posted 09-04-2010 11:19 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 84 by bluescat48, posted 09-04-2010 11:21 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 86 by crashfrog, posted 09-04-2010 11:58 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024