Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can Natural Selection Produce Intelligent Design?
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 51 of 75 (234717)
08-19-2005 4:13 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by lmrenault
08-18-2005 8:51 PM


Re: how about some answers
lmrenault writes:
It would be exciting to see unique human capabilities come out of artificial life/intelligence. But [...] this wouldn't do it for me simply because they would obviously be the product of an intelligent designer, i.e. man.
Doesn't that presuppose that we would have to know exactly how to build human-like intelligence? It could well be that that is the only way to achieve it, but my bets are on a much simpler route: we provide the initial rough conditions for a development process and let "nature" take its course.
I am thinking of two specific cases: genetic algorithms and neural networks. The first involves an evolutionary process, the second a learning process. But in both cases we would not know in advance the exact configuration of the end product, so we could not rightly be called the intelligent designers of it. At most we could take the credit for intelligently setting up the initial conditions, although we would only be mimicking things we've already seen in nature.
The crux is that the end product might easily surpass our expectations. As I've already described in another thread, an experiment with a genetic algorithm that was supposed to evolve oscillators, produced a radio that picked up an ambient oscillating signal and simply passed it on. That's a very "creative" solution to the problem, and, most importantly, it never entered the minds of the experimenters that it could be done that way. So it wasn't, to use your words, "obviously the product of an intelligent designer", effectively proving that there are other ways.

We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further. - Richard Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by lmrenault, posted 08-18-2005 8:51 PM lmrenault has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Brad McFall, posted 08-19-2005 10:14 AM Parasomnium has replied
 Message 59 by Annafan, posted 08-19-2005 5:08 PM Parasomnium has not replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 53 of 75 (234792)
08-19-2005 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Brad McFall
08-19-2005 10:14 AM


Re: how about some answers
Brad McFall writes:
If you still have issues about not thinking that my sentences "make sense" please DOo wait.
Well, once more, your post is very hard to follow. There are probably lots of connections to all kinds of interesting fields that you have intimate knowledge of, but you routinely assume that we all do, witness your casual sprinkling of references without any further explanation. That, combined with your idiosyncratic style of writing, makes it very hard for me to understand what you are actually saying.
Do you realise we never talk about the content of your posts, but only ever about their form? It makes me wonder how you do your shopping at the greengrocer's. If you do manage to come home with the stuff you asked for in the shop, then please imagine I'm the shopkeeper and talk to me the way you talk to them. Is that too much to ask? It's almost as if plain English is a foreign language to you, as it is to me. But at least I'm making an effort. Why don't you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Brad McFall, posted 08-19-2005 10:14 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Brad McFall, posted 08-19-2005 11:07 AM Parasomnium has replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 55 of 75 (234797)
08-19-2005 11:13 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Brad McFall
08-19-2005 11:07 AM


Re: how about some answers
Having you raise your voice is not my intention.
I have to go now. I'll get back to you later.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Brad McFall, posted 08-19-2005 11:07 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Brad McFall, posted 08-19-2005 11:16 AM Parasomnium has replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 57 of 75 (234868)
08-19-2005 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Brad McFall
08-19-2005 11:16 AM


Communication
Brad,
When I wrote my last message to you, I didn't have much time. So I'll give it another go.
Brad McFall writes:
It takes too much time to respond to everything at your high level of intelligence. Not every one here provokes my deepest considerations.
I am not sure whether you were being sarcastic here, or sincere. If sarcastic, I must have provoked it with the tone of my message #53 ("Is that too much to ask?","Why don't you [make an effort]?"). I assure you, that was not the way I meant it.
I did not mean to dishearten you. I think you have much to offer to this forum, and I was only trying to get you to communicate. There is a middle road between a simple chat and an exchange of post-doc level essays. Most of the discussions on this forum take that middle road. But a prerequisite for a meaningful discussion is a common language. And your language, Brad, is definitely not common. So, unless you want to continue in soliloqui, it is imperative that you adopt a style of writing that the rest of us here can relate to.
Take care, indeed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Brad McFall, posted 08-19-2005 11:16 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Brad McFall, posted 08-19-2005 3:21 PM Parasomnium has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024