Larni writes:
Why did Yahweh make sin heritable?
It may be that he didn't make it so but that it was inevitably so - a function of the natural created order of things. Consider the following elements/hints - after which I'll pose what I think might be the case.
We would agree that the 'Trinity' is a mysterious notion, the idea of three persons mingled into one God. Whatever about it's incomprehensibility, it appears there exists an intimacy/intermingling between the persons of the Godhead that far exceeds even the closest of intimacies experienced by us.
As Jaywill so frequently and eloquently points out, it appears to be Gods intent that those who 'go to heaven' will in fact join in and share in that most intimate of unions. We are told that saved men are elevated to the status of
children of God which, considering that Christ is the
Son of God, indicates our partaking in this most intimate of unions. Other intimate pictures abound in the Bible: Christians described as part of the same body, Christians (collectively) the bride of Christ - with marriage decribed as a place where two become one.
Lastly, we are also told that this eternal 'future' situation is the result of
restorative action on God's part - that man's fall was in some ways, a falling away from a lofty, intimate height.
Your question is set in the context of the post-Fall world. In that context, men exist as discrete personhoods, separated from their neighbour physically, emotionally, spiritually. Intimacy between men is an awkward, frequently superficial (even within the context of marriage) affair. The soul of man has trouble looking the soul of another man straight in the eyes. Indeed, it often has trouble looking into it's own eyes - as your work in psychology doubtlessly informs you. The word "hereditary" perfectly underlines our tendency to see ourselves as separated-from-others individuals - we envisage an inherited trait or disease as something which has leapt the dividing boundary between individuals. That we be separated individuals appears to us to be the natural state when in fact it is an unnatural one - one that merely reflects the Fallen environment in which we live.
The pre-Fall situation was otherwise. Mankind was modelled on the godly order: an intimate, singular entity albeit an entity made up of personhoods ("let us make man in our image and likeness"). So when sin-disease infected that singular entity through one of it's constituent parts (Adam), the densest of networks of interconnectivity between it and all other constituent parts (the rest of us) ensured easy passage for Sin to all corners.
The only way to prevent such a spread would have been
not to create man in God's own image and likeness but to create him in something like his post-Fall state: separate, individual, discrete and separated from other men. Which would defeat the purpose of making man in God's own image and likeness. Man in God's own image and likeness can become part of the Godhead what with being of like-order. Man unlike God cannot mingle with God any more than oil with water can mingle.
-
If one accepts that Adam deserved punishment and Yahweh did indeed punish him why did Yahweh also decide to punish other people (Adam descendants) so setting in motion the events that required Yahweh kill his own son.
Does the above help? Adam was part of the body mankind. In infecting himself, he infected all parts. The fact we can inherit from another might be seen as a vestige of the uber-connectedness that existed in our pre-Fall state. And a precursor to the connectedness that shall again exist in the eternal state.
-
I would contend that Yahweh's 'go to' method for getting things done is suffering even to the point of making himself suffer, but that can't be right, can it?
Suffering is a fantastic way to tell us that something is wrong. It tends to get our attention and without it we'd be dead in no time.
Don't diss suffering!
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.