Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

Calendar ends in 2012 - Oh Noes!!

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Calendar ends in 2012 - Oh Noes!!
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 17 of 20 (536088)
11-19-2009 7:04 PM 		Reply to: Message 16 by Taz
11-19-2009 6:50 PM

Y2K was not a doomsday concern. But it was a concern nonetheless. Only dumbasses thought computer glitches would cause the world to end.
​
And I would say the same about those who accept the 2012 crap.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Taz, posted 11-19-2009 6:50 PM Taz has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Taz, posted 11-19-2009 11:40 PM bluescat48 has replied
  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 20 of 20 (536281)
11-21-2009 10:18 AM 		Reply to: Message 18 by Taz
11-19-2009 11:40 PM

No, there's a difference. Y2K was a real concern.
​
I wasn't saying there was no legitimate concern, I was saying that it was not a doomsday point. There was no way Y2K was going to end the earth any more than a misunderstood ending of a Mayan calender is going to end the world in 2012.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Taz, posted 11-19-2009 11:40 PM Taz has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024