Hyroglyphx, your post, short as it is, is so wrong in so many fronts, I have trouble finding a place to start.
HYroglyphx writes:
I think the movie looks like a way overdone apocalyptic script.
You like reviewing a movie before you even saw it? Applied to our culture, it's called prejudice.
The spouse and I saw it. We loved. It's not your typical apocalypic movie with an American white man saving the day.
What was that one at the turn of the century, Y2K?
I'm sick and tired of people using the Y2K bug to compare to something like the 2012 hysteria. There were REAL concerns about disruptions in our networks. Everyone spent a ton of money to fix the problem before it became a problem.
It's like crashing your car while having seat belt on and going at 60 mph and then proclaim the seat belt "myth" because obviously nothing happened to you. Never mind the fact that your seat belt saved your life, you're one of those that would go around using the fact that you're still alive as proof that seat belts doesn't work. What did you think saved your life? The easter bunny?
Y2K was not a doomsday concern. But it was a concern nonetheless. Only dumbasses thought computer glitches would cause the world to end.
Added by edit.
And some of us actually know the real reason why the world is going to end on 2012. That's when Sarah Palin gets elected into the white house and begin her 20 year reign of terror. I'd imagine everyone with an iq of more than 40 will be shot on sight.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.